StrategyDesk also got a trigger based on the cross. It
shows as one of those "looks like it crossed yesterday, but really
was today" crosses that Matt warns about. The Stop Loss is a
defined percentage down from the entry price on some of the
systems, but there is none on this one. Disclaimer: I am not
at the computer that is actually running SD, so I can't verify some
details.
I'm not sure what you mean by "stopped out" since the Mech
systems don't have sell stops unless the MAs cross back. My
StrategyDesk executed a buy of FAZ at 9:45 and nothing since.
(It also had a weird buy then sell within 30 seconds of FAS at the
open - I'll have to check on that one.)
I thought that I would add my 2 cents. I haven't really
had a problem with trial members posting (I missed this weekend's
"problem") and actually think that Yago's posts were fine, not that
he needs me to defend him. He's posted only 9 times, with
reasonable cautions about being too bearish, other than the last
one that may have been trying to be cute - similar to many
others. Bottom line is that I wouldn't change anything unless
more of this weekend's episode occurs, which Matt handled fine
IMO.
I have used TD Ameritrade's alerts that are triggered on various
parameters. Go to Research & Ideas>Alerts. You
can choose 2 email addresses, mobile phone, and/or pager. Of
course, you need an account there. BTW, I have only used the
email options.
What I would like to have is the ability to filter out _only_
the Off-Topic posts when I'm time-limited, etc. Right now,
the filters only allow one topic at a time to be viewed.
Matt, maybe you could consider this in your next version of the
blog? Perhaps being able to have a check box next to each
Topic so you could enable whatever combination of filters you want,
and having it "stick"?
As expected, it appears that the FAZ/FAS charts (at least at TD
Ameritrade) have not corrected for the reverse splits, so the MAs
are distorted. I have put these systems on "pause" until they
settle down.
I'm not sure about other platforms, but I remember that Strategy
Desk didn't adjust for the large dividend that SRS had last year
and that the EMAs and SMAs were distorted for a time (depending on
the parameters.) So I would plan on turning off the trading
for FAS and FAZ for Thursday until I see that things are settling
out. But the systems should get back to working fine after
that.
If I remember correctly, V (and MC) don't have any credit
exposure (unlike AXP); they just make their money on the
transaction fees. So as people run low on savings, they may
start using their plastic more?
If Wave C or 3 is only .618 times the first leg down, then we
have already hit the target of 894. Is this a possible
alternative, or does Wave C have to be at least =Wave A?
What is the reason behind this recommendation? I have both
SRS systems trading in 1 account using StrategyDesk (TD
Ameritrade), using a somewhat smaller position size for each
strategy. Occasionally they will be contradicting each other,
but usually that's in a choppy market when the direction is unclear
anyway. Thanks.
Yes, I can run the strategies without a problem on StrategyDesk,
using a 6-year old HP laptop, connecting to the internet wirelessly
to my cable modem.
I agree with your comments. I thought that the old
systems were pretty much public, so I didn't worry about posting
the formula, since a search of the blog would show them
anyway. But I won't post them again.
Here is an example of the formulas that I am using (this is an
Exit formula for URE, based on the SRS SMAs crossing.) Note
that the delays are different from your formulas.
(MovingAverage[MA,Close,8,0,6,1,SRS] >
MovingAverage[MA,Close,71,0,6,1,SRS] AND
MovingAverage[MA,Close,8,0,6,2,SRS] <=
MovingAverage[MA,Close,71,0,6,2,SRS]) OR
(Bar[Hour,1]*100+Bar[Minute,1]>=1559)
Note that when backtesting, the trades will not quite be
correct, so you have to decrease the delays by 1.
Hope this is enough to get you going. It took a while to
get the correct syntax figured out.
FWIW, my StrategyDesk saw the crossover on the next-to-last bar
yesterday, so it bought FAZ at 3:45 and sold at EOD, for about a 1%
loss. EDIT: Nevermind, this is the EMA system; I don't know
what the SMA system did.
The community is delayed by three days for non registered users.
Title: FAZ cross on SD StrategyDesk
Posted by twins on 22nd of Jul 2009 at 10:52 am
StrategyDesk also got a trigger based on the cross. It shows as one of those "looks like it crossed yesterday, but really was today" crosses that Matt warns about. The Stop Loss is a defined percentage down from the entry price on some of the systems, but there is none on this one. Disclaimer: I am not at the computer that is actually running SD, so I can't verify some details.
Bob
Sorry, you're right, I should
FAZ
Posted by twins on 22nd of Jul 2009 at 10:34 am
Sorry, you're right, I should have checked. I somehow recalled that they were profit stops. But my system didn't hit the stop.
Bob
Title: FAZ Mech Sys I'm not
FAZ
Posted by twins on 22nd of Jul 2009 at 10:29 am
I'm not sure what you mean by "stopped out" since the Mech systems don't have sell stops unless the MAs cross back. My StrategyDesk executed a buy of FAZ at 9:45 and nothing since. (It also had a weird buy then sell within 30 seconds of FAS at the open - I'll have to check on that one.)
Bob
I suggest that you set
Cspirit
Posted by twins on 21st of Jul 2009 at 01:20 pm
I suggest that you set up the automatic trading if you have a job; it eliminates the stress of trying to monitor things.
Title: Trial posting is OK
SRS
Posted by twins on 20th of Jul 2009 at 01:16 pm
I thought that I would add my 2 cents. I haven't really had a problem with trial members posting (I missed this weekend's "problem") and actually think that Yago's posts were fine, not that he needs me to defend him. He's posted only 9 times, with reasonable cautions about being too bearish, other than the last one that may have been trying to be cute - similar to many others. Bottom line is that I wouldn't change anything unless more of this weekend's episode occurs, which Matt handled fine IMO.
Bob in NJ
Title: Alerts I have used TD
SMS text message alerts
Posted by twins on 17th of Jul 2009 at 11:35 am
I have used TD Ameritrade's alerts that are triggered on various parameters. Go to Research & Ideas>Alerts. You can choose 2 email addresses, mobile phone, and/or pager. Of course, you need an account there. BTW, I have only used the email options.
Bob
What I would like to
FWIW: It would be great if members of the blog ...
Posted by twins on 10th of Jul 2009 at 10:02 am
What I would like to have is the ability to filter out _only_ the Off-Topic posts when I'm time-limited, etc. Right now, the filters only allow one topic at a time to be viewed. Matt, maybe you could consider this in your next version of the blog? Perhaps being able to have a check box next to each Topic so you could enable whatever combination of filters you want, and having it "stick"?
Bob
FAZ Systems
Posted by twins on 9th of Jul 2009 at 09:35 am
As expected, it appears that the FAZ/FAS charts (at least at TD Ameritrade) have not corrected for the reverse splits, so the MAs are distorted. I have put these systems on "pause" until they settle down.
Bob
I'm not sure about other
FAZ 1:10 Reverse Split; FAS 1:5 Reverse Split
Posted by twins on 6th of Jul 2009 at 10:09 am
I'm not sure about other platforms, but I remember that Strategy Desk didn't adjust for the large dividend that SRS had last year and that the EMAs and SMAs were distorted for a time (depending on the parameters.) So I would plan on turning off the trading for FAS and FAZ for Thursday until I see that things are settling out. But the systems should get back to working fine after that.
Bob in NJ
If I remember correctly, V
VISA from the watchlist, fell the last 3 days while ...
Posted by twins on 2nd of Jul 2009 at 10:42 am
If I remember correctly, V (and MC) don't have any credit exposure (unlike AXP); they just make their money on the transaction fees. So as people run low on savings, they may start using their plastic more?
Bob in NJ
I don't have SD where
60 period stoch on the SPX and NAS 15 minute ...
Posted by twins on 23rd of Jun 2009 at 03:13 pm
I don't have SD where I am now, but check one bar earlier (i.e. what you would call 1:30-1:45.
I believe that you should
60 period stoch on the SPX and NAS 15 minute ...
Posted by twins on 23rd of Jun 2009 at 02:48 pm
I believe that you should have had a whipsaw pair of trades at 1:45 and 2:00. Mine did (I wish they didn't!). Check that the market hours are correct.
Bob
If Wave C or 3
Wave 3 for S&P
Posted by twins on 22nd of Jun 2009 at 02:06 pm
If Wave C or 3 is only .618 times the first leg down, then we have already hit the target of 894. Is this a possible alternative, or does Wave C have to be at least =Wave A?
Matt, What is the reason behind
Matt; Should you pick just one mechanical system to trade or ...
Posted by twins on 17th of Jun 2009 at 09:25 am
Matt,
What is the reason behind this recommendation? I have both SRS systems trading in 1 account using StrategyDesk (TD Ameritrade), using a somewhat smaller position size for each strategy. Occasionally they will be contradicting each other, but usually that's in a choppy market when the direction is unclear anyway. Thanks.
Bob in NJ
Yes, I can run the
Hardware to run Multiple Systems
Posted by twins on 16th of Jun 2009 at 05:46 pm
Yes, I can run the strategies without a problem on StrategyDesk, using a 6-year old HP laptop, connecting to the internet wirelessly to my cable modem.
Bob in NJ
PM to Angela
FAZ
Posted by twins on 10th of Jun 2009 at 01:02 pm
Just sent you a PM, but don't know if you know about them. Click on "Inbox" at the top of the blog.
Bob
I agree with your comments. I
StrategyDesk
Posted by twins on 4th of Jun 2009 at 10:44 am
I agree with your comments. I thought that the old systems were pretty much public, so I didn't worry about posting the formula, since a search of the blog would show them anyway. But I won't post them again.
Bob
Strategy Desk formulas
StrategyDesk
Posted by twins on 4th of Jun 2009 at 10:05 am
Here is an example of the formulas that I am using (this is an Exit formula for URE, based on the SRS SMAs crossing.) Note that the delays are different from your formulas.
(MovingAverage[MA,Close,8,0,6,1,SRS] > MovingAverage[MA,Close,71,0,6,1,SRS] AND MovingAverage[MA,Close,8,0,6,2,SRS] <= MovingAverage[MA,Close,71,0,6,2,SRS]) OR (Bar[Hour,1]*100+Bar[Minute,1]>=1559)
Note that when backtesting, the trades will not quite be correct, so you have to decrease the delays by 1.
Hope this is enough to get you going. It took a while to get the correct syntax figured out.
Bob in Southern NJ
FWIW, my StrategyDesk saw the
FAZ EOD system
Posted by twins on 21st of May 2009 at 10:49 am
FWIW, my StrategyDesk saw the crossover on the next-to-last bar yesterday, so it bought FAZ at 3:45 and sold at EOD, for about a 1% loss. EDIT: Nevermind, this is the EMA system; I don't know what the SMA system did.
UYG
SKF Swing System
Posted by twins on 20th of May 2009 at 10:59 am
UYG