Posted by fishbait on 19th of Nov 2011 at 09:24 am
I agree. We need new Trade history and Statics report. The ones
on this web site now are of no value. To leave the old
system reports on the web site is false advertising. Because they
have re-programmed the computer we have no idea what to expect.
They gave us 260 trade stats, but the old ones have over 400 for
the multi entry system. We need 16 years of trade stats from trade
station on this reprogrammed system.
Yes I will be updating the statistics and write ups on the SPY
section when I have time. However since system is not open to
the public, it's not a huge priority right now. Plus as Tom
states, only about 3 - 4 traders were affected
again, I will update the statistics, FAQ, charts, and
description page eventually, but for now it's NOT false advertising
because again, it's not open to the public for signup and I have
been very clear about what I have done with the system all along
with newsletters, videos, writeups etc.
the fact that there are no posts here, tells me that no one is
in this trade anyway.
I'm still in the trade too. I've committed only a
reasonable amount to the system, so I don't get stressed, and I
don't feel the need to post anything (usually!). I just take
the signals and do the trades. Thanks for the hard work and
the 10% guarantee!
Posted by stockjock34 on 21st of Nov 2011 at 05:35 pm
I don't understand. Aren't we supposed to stay in the
trade until we get an alert - buy to cover? I didn't watch
the video, would rather just mindlessly follow the system. I
expect an alert when it is time, please correct me if I am wrong.
Oh yea, I'm still in deep! You have not given me a signal to
sell yet! I'm in the single entry, so still a little under water,
but hangin in here with you Matt!
Matt, I'm still in. Just treat discretionary trading and system
trading separate. Don't let system signals affect your
discretionary trades, and vice versa. That's the key imo.
I believe when Matt was looking at the recent changes it
affected somewhere around 3-4 trades (he may or may not have
mentioned this in the video/write-up). Being that one of the
changes is a stop it will affect the severity of a trade but not
the trade entry itself and then the parameters changing some of the
core entries are so very rare that it affects a small amount.
I think Matt can load a secondary results for members to review
but I personally want the author of a system to never change what
was posted when I first start following and then when/if changes
are made just start following based on the changed parameters going
forward. You seem to say leaving the results up is false
advertising but I couldn't disagree more, what would be devious is
if we changed the system every week or month and took DOWN the
results showing bad trades and all of a sudden had this new history
that didn't show some trades that actually happened.
Anyway, I would look at this more as 95-99% of the system is
still the same and this was just a small change on the
periphery. The root and philosophy remains the same.
Lastly, then knowing how much it affects things in the future is
only something you can watch and track to know.
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
Trade history
IMPORTANT - SPY System Newsletter
Posted by fishbait on 19th of Nov 2011 at 09:24 am
I agree. We need new Trade history and Statics report. The ones on this web site now are of no value. To leave the old system reports on the web site is false advertising. Because they have re-programmed the computer we have no idea what to expect. They gave us 260 trade stats, but the old ones have over 400 for the multi entry system. We need 16 years of trade stats from trade station on this reprogrammed system.
Yes I will be updating
Posted by matt on 21st of Nov 2011 at 11:00 am
Yes I will be updating the statistics and write ups on the SPY section when I have time. However since system is not open to the public, it's not a huge priority right now. Plus as Tom states, only about 3 - 4 traders were affected
again, I will update the statistics, FAQ, charts, and description page eventually, but for now it's NOT false advertising because again, it's not open to the public for signup and I have been very clear about what I have done with the system all along with newsletters, videos, writeups etc.
the fact that there are no posts here, tells me that no one is in this trade anyway.
I'm in. Another part of
Posted by ascr on 23rd of Nov 2011 at 12:03 pm
I'm in. Another part of the *usually* silent majority.
I'm still in the trade
Posted by trip on 22nd of Nov 2011 at 10:14 am
I'm still in the trade too. I've committed only a reasonable amount to the system, so I don't get stressed, and I don't feel the need to post anything (usually!). I just take the signals and do the trades. Thanks for the hard work and the 10% guarantee!
yes, me 2
Posted by tsurplus on 23rd of Nov 2011 at 12:40 am
and me :-)
Posted by biketastic on 23rd of Nov 2011 at 08:56 am
i'm still in
Posted by rharvey on 22nd of Nov 2011 at 06:53 am
i'm still in
Hey Matt in am in the trade also and plan to follow whenever it gives a exit signal
Posted by kattap on 22nd of Nov 2011 at 01:28 am
hey matt -- I'm still
Posted by Michael on 21st of Nov 2011 at 10:30 pm
hey matt -- I'm still in this trade, never second guessed it. We'll see where it ends up, but just saying...
why wouldn't i be in?
Posted by stockjock34 on 21st of Nov 2011 at 05:35 pm
I don't understand. Aren't we supposed to stay in the trade until we get an alert - buy to cover? I didn't watch the video, would rather just mindlessly follow the system. I expect an alert when it is time, please correct me if I am wrong.
By the way, I'm long
Posted by Jim on 21st of Nov 2011 at 04:03 pm
By the way, I'm long an inverse fund so I would sell to close out the trade
Oh yea, I'm still in
Posted by Jim on 21st of Nov 2011 at 03:54 pm
Oh yea, I'm still in deep! You have not given me a signal to sell yet! I'm in the single entry, so still a little under water, but hangin in here with you Matt!
Matt, I'm still in. Just
Posted by cw12 on 21st of Nov 2011 at 03:07 pm
Matt, I'm still in. Just treat discretionary trading and system trading separate. Don't let system signals affect your discretionary trades, and vice versa. That's the key imo.
Still in and liking the
Posted by jgoot on 21st of Nov 2011 at 01:57 pm
Still in and liking the action today/last week. Skipped the 2nd entry and got in again on the 3rd and 4th. Overall trade is a winner for me now.
I'm still in, and much
Posted by alefhand on 21st of Nov 2011 at 12:40 pm
I'm still in, and much happier today!
i am still in too
Posted by madaneag on 21st of Nov 2011 at 11:45 pm
i am still in too
I believe when Matt was
Posted by tom on 21st of Nov 2011 at 07:33 am
I believe when Matt was looking at the recent changes it affected somewhere around 3-4 trades (he may or may not have mentioned this in the video/write-up). Being that one of the changes is a stop it will affect the severity of a trade but not the trade entry itself and then the parameters changing some of the core entries are so very rare that it affects a small amount.
I think Matt can load a secondary results for members to review but I personally want the author of a system to never change what was posted when I first start following and then when/if changes are made just start following based on the changed parameters going forward. You seem to say leaving the results up is false advertising but I couldn't disagree more, what would be devious is if we changed the system every week or month and took DOWN the results showing bad trades and all of a sudden had this new history that didn't show some trades that actually happened.
Anyway, I would look at this more as 95-99% of the system is still the same and this was just a small change on the periphery. The root and philosophy remains the same. Lastly, then knowing how much it affects things in the future is only something you can watch and track to know.