also regarding DigiNomad and if he's still a subscriber not. I would normally not address that, however he's posted about that dozens of times here making it everyones buiness for some reason so let me through my 2 cents in. 

At least from what he's posted I don't agree with this logic about leaving.  First off yes I have a bias because this is a business and it helps us to have more subscribers. 

that said - When DigiNomad would post that he's leaving most of the time his reasoning was that he's already learned everything here, or he's got some free Twitter sources where he gets trade ideas from, or the fact that some people get offended by his posts. What you can't find one idea here to make more than the $50 subscription cost? some trade idea, some system trade? some intermediate swing trade I may post such as on precious metals earlier this year in Feb/Mar?

Where I don't agree with this reasoning for leaving is his comments about having learned everything here or that he has free sources to get this trade ideas from . For me, I have numerous subscribers to other services that I've had for years. Some of them I rarely if ever look at, and I never look at them daily maybe at most once a week here and there. The thing is, even though I don't use those sources that much - it's still overall worth it for me to keep subscriptions - if I get get 3 or 6 ideas in a year that make me good money, more than I'm spending on those subscriptions, then it's worth it for me! Just because I'm not actively using all their data and ideas and market analysis, I don't have to in order to justify the cost. 

I'd argue the same thing here: You don't need to listen and watch every newsletter or look at every trade idea, or every blog post, or even do all the systems trades-  if you are able to get even just a handful of actionable ideas over a year that make you more money than the subscription, why not keep it?  If all you did was take the mean reversion system trades and nothing else, you pay for the subscription 10 or 30 times over. If all you did was position trading where you are trying to position into bigger trends, such as my bullish call on gold and silver back in March - or Uranium back in early 2020 - I'll typically point out secular trends that I see developing a handful of times a year - if all you did was that it's worth keeping  a subscription. 

I get simplifying one's life - for but for most people, the small cost of subscription is pretty meaningless to their accounts. Most should be focused on formulating a trading plan and trading style that fits them - that will benefit you 100 fold more than cutting some cheap $50 a month subscription. Unless you are tight on budget, which then you probably shouldn't be trading anyway

again I'm biased because it benefits me if you stay - I just don't agree with the argument of there's nothing here that would justify keeping the subscription  and thinking you have to use it all the time to make it worth keeping

Thanks Matt appreciate all you do!