The community is delayed by three days for non registered users.

Very enlightening, thank you!

IYM looks toppy on daily charts

Posted by junkmaylbox on 7th of Aug 2009 at 05:59 am

RSI is at extreme levels, volume has been tapering off on the advance and the index is following the $USD. Is anyone playing SMN here?

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=iym&p=D&yr=0&mn=8&dy=0&id=p39002259743

Interesting self-analysis. You are likely to be over-trading then, trying to play all the opportunities that you see (or nealy so). Scaling back and being more selective might be a nice change for you. Good luck!

I second more posts per

Small Blog Fixes

Posted by junkmaylbox on 4th of Aug 2009 at 10:05 am

I second more posts per page too.

Your updates are superb. While

Quick Market Recap

Posted by junkmaylbox on 4th of Aug 2009 at 01:35 am

Your updates are superb. While I don't follow markets intra-day, I prefer more to less.

If you don't believe it, there is nothing to talk about... This is a high-end technical site for adults who can tell truth from lies and who don't believe popular hogwash. Matt and Steve already answered this question many times. They work hard to provide us with quality predictions that materialize exactly as stated. Has anybody else from your newsletter writers, including your favorite Mike Swanson, had the same record to valid predictions??

Bull markets require a period of consolidation of at least 8 months before breaking out of patterns. Has anybody seen anything like that now yet? Mike S. is a mere amateur in the markets rife with mainpulation. People who lost money following his advice are not going to be kind to him.

Matt, could you tell whether

SPX 15 min

Posted by junkmaylbox on 29th of Jul 2009 at 12:47 pm

Matt, could you tell whether it's a distribution or acquisition based on the pattern? Selling looks more impulsive to me. Is volume a guide here?

Make sure you use EMA

New SRS system

Posted by junkmaylbox on 28th of Jul 2009 at 06:06 pm

Make sure you use EMA (exponential MA) or SMA (simple or arithmetic MA) as stated in the instructions for the mechanical system. WMA is neither of the above.

Mike Swanson

Mike Swanson's take

Posted by junkmaylbox on 27th of Jul 2009 at 01:15 pm

He's an idiot! Yet he was suggesting this idea last year in late fall, that after June 2006 the market could become in the primary uptrend again. I am still wondering if his whole site is enthusing his declaration, there are a few independently minded folks there. His expertise level turns out to be pathetic.

On a different subject, could you please re-post the latest COT report from Gerald? I am curious of his take at the moment on the gold and gold stocks. Thanks in advance!

Indeed!

Interesting Article

Posted by junkmaylbox on 26th of Jul 2009 at 06:11 pm

Indeed!

That was a retorical question? In firefox, I don't like a threaded view of e-mails. Instead, I choose to view the most recent e-mail and order them by the time of its arrival. I have observed that people don't follow the subject, so categorizing postings by subject often leads to a futile attempt to impose a semblance of order, when no such order is present.

Fundamentals underneath the technicals

Posted by junkmaylbox on 26th of Jul 2009 at 01:32 pm
Title: Why fundamentals are horrible and will bring the markets down. A commentary by Roger Wiegand on kitco

Cannot change the number of posts per page

Posted by junkmaylbox on 26th of Jul 2009 at 01:03 pm

Matt, could this become an adjustable setting? There are a lot fewer posts that fit on a page now than before, I need to turn to the next page more often.

John, Did you put any

Elliott Wave Interview

Posted by junkmaylbox on 25th of Jul 2009 at 08:03 am

John, Did you put any labels on your chart? I do not see any. It might be a newly created limitation of Stockcharts. Please post a snapsot of the chart for those who don't have stockcharts' membership. Thanks!

From one the technical analysis textbooks I recall that the pattern is bearish 9 times out of 10: the ratio is 9:1.

The expanding triangle (aka the megaphone formation) signifies a competition between buys and sellers, each of which expects the market to go in their own direction: hence the broadening scope. It may indicate market manipulation: last year I spotted that formation on CSIQ in May - August. CSIQ is a solar energy stock, and you know the story of oil futures going up to 147.


The H&S is a natural formation for market tops. That it did not play out signifies that the natural contraction was prevented from running its course by arrival of powerful players on the market to support it and move higher. GS through its ties to international bankers is one big culprit.

Good grief, the guy no

according to WILLIAM O'NEIL

Posted by junkmaylbox on 23rd of Jul 2009 at 04:18 pm

Good grief, the guy no longer is in charge of the company that bears his name. His followers have little idea of how to fully utilize all of his knowledge.

I concur. With a full-time

IYR Short (SRS Long) Hurts!

Posted by junkmaylbox on 23rd of Jul 2009 at 01:59 pm

I concur. With a full-time job, doing day trading is virtually impossible :( So intermediate and long-term swing trading are the options left.

If one is following the

IYR Short (SRS Long) Hurts!

Posted by junkmaylbox on 23rd of Jul 2009 at 01:55 pm

If one is following the consensus, one is always late. The primary trend  reversals were very obvious after 3 days for me. There is no need to turn reality into a picture of reality, and wait till majority agrees on it.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!