It will be difficult keeping the YOY numbers this low in July
because the month over month numbers for May and June of 2024 were
0%, and the month over month number forJuly 2024 was 0.1%.
Once those drop out of the calculation, the YOY CPI will be
higher. For example, if, over the next 5 months the month
over month numbers are 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.3% and 0.2%
(likely the best case scenario), the YOY number for the 12 months
ending July 2025 will 3.2%. And of course, if those month
over month numbers are higher...
Steve: When you say you'd like to see a red to green move (XERS
for example), can you share where your actual buy point would
be? Are you looking for a lower open, then if the stock
starts to move up you buy as soon as the candle turns green, or are
you looking for a lower open, a move up with the buy point being
above the prior day's high? Or something else?
Can anyone give me a technical read on SGN? Looks like it
hit bottom late January at just under $2.00/share, daily volume in
low 100,000's. Had a one-day move closing at $4.50 (intraday
high of $7.50) on volume of $100 million shares. Has drifted
back since closing today at $2.13/share on 103,000 shares traded.
Is this likely to pop again? Is it likely that volume
comes in? I have no idea what that 100 million shares was
about on a single day.
Steve, If the 10 Year Yield were to reach 5%, would you
deem it a reasonable place to park some longterm money not
earmarked for investment? What are the downside risks, if
any?
Not quite sure what you're referring to. Reported CPI year
over year for July was 2.9%; CPI year over year for August was
2.5%. That's a fairly low number considering CPI peaked at
9.1% in 2022. If you feel the numbers aren't to be trusted,
that's different and you wouldn't get an argument from me.
But as presented, the August CPI reported a few days ago does
not appear to be high.
Gold trading at $2526 this morning. Miners trading at
levels that were last seen when gold was at $1700-$1800. I
just don't get it. I know mining expenses have increased
somewhat in recent years, but energy prices are nearly the same.
All I heard years ago was that once gold went to all-time
highs the mining stocks would explode. Well it has and they
haven't...but why? In my opinion, the miners should be double
where they are at present based upon today's gold price.
Where am I wrong?
Thanks, Steve. Is that assessment based upon the market's
reaction to this morning's inflation number or were there earlier
signs over the past few weeks?
Tuesday's newsletter? I do not see a link to last night's
newsletter, either in the newsletter calendar section or in the
trading community. With Matt away was there an announcement to skip
it that I missed?
Since you put "experts" in quotes, I take it you are skeptical
of their analysis and have a different take altogether. I
managed a major law firm for more than 35 years before retiring 3
years ago. Every lawyer I know (there are many - highly
educated and well versed in the law) agrees with the main stream
media analysis...as did all 12 jurors...rather quickly.
Would love to know what you believe was strange about the trial.
Feel free to send me an email. My apology if I read you
wrong.
You do...do an a hell of a job, Matt...Steve does too!
Thank you both. I am a far better trader for having
stumbled across BPT years ago. You can't be all things to
everyone, so don't try.
Completely agree that seasonally adjusted numbers are "gas
lighting". That said, this is not a "Biden thing" as the Zero
Hedge author would have the reader believe. The fiddling has
been going on for decades, during both Democrat and Republican
administrations. I'm not excusing it - the concept is a farce
and highly manipulative - just pointing out it's
bipartisan.
That said, in my opinion the Zero Hedge author has his own
agenda and that's what weakens his overall point and disappoints.
He too manipulates the reader by his characterizations of
the numbers. For example, why is it that a .1% miss on the
CPI to the upside makes for a "hotter " than expected number (the
implication being that it's a disaster), but a .1% miss to the
downside on the PPI (which we know is inaccurate but putting that
aside) is characterized as the "smallest possible miss"? The
answer is obvious.
I'm struggling to find the right entry point for KISS system
trades. Have set my favorites but when I receive an email
alert, more often than not the stock has already made a big move.
That makes me hesitate. Yesterday for example, I received an email
for JD after it moved up 15% on the day. Today it gapped higher
again on the open. Chasing those type of moves does not sit
well with me, even ones with a smaller % move at the outset.
I understand KISS is a trending following system identifying
stocks that may move higher for months, but the initial entries
seem exceedingly high relative to the initial STS. I struggle
making the adjustment since my plays for years have been tied to
BPT trade ideas, the majority of which rely upon a breakout from a
pattern.
KISS System question: Maybe I missed it, but how does one
determine a good entry point for these trades? Unlike the
"trade ideas" that usually have a clearly defined breakpoint, or
level of support, the KISS trades generally do not. Do I hope
for a pullback closer to the 1st STS, or do I just jump
in?
If I'm at the computer trading stocks intraday, I tend to use a
5 minute chart for my entry. In my opinion, patterns and
breaking of resistance levels in this timeframe offer up reliable
entry points. When and where to exit a position (placing the right
stop) is more difficult to gauge; still working on that. I
tend to play high beta stocks. Being a skeptic by nature I often
place my stops too tight. Reducing position size allows me to place
wider stops. Learning through experience; there's no better
way.
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
The community is delayed by three days for non registered users.
Understatement of the year.
Trump still not doing the market any favors. I have ...
Posted by RichieD on 31st of Mar 2025 at 07:44 am
Understatement of the year.
Port fee plan will be
Posted by RichieD on 19th of Mar 2025 at 09:42 am
Port fee plan will be far more destructive than tariffs if it goes through.
https://www.lloydslist.com/LL1152844/US-could-face-trade-apocalypse-if-Trump-port-fee-plan-isnt-killed
It will be difficult keeping
USA CPI (MoM) For February 0.2% Vs 0.3% Est.; 0.5% ...
Posted by RichieD on 12th of Mar 2025 at 11:17 am
It will be difficult keeping the YOY numbers this low in July because the month over month numbers for May and June of 2024 were 0%, and the month over month number forJuly 2024 was 0.1%. Once those drop out of the calculation, the YOY CPI will be higher. For example, if, over the next 5 months the month over month numbers are 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.3% and 0.2% (likely the best case scenario), the YOY number for the 12 months ending July 2025 will 3.2%. And of course, if those month over month numbers are higher...
Steve: When you say you'd
Posted by RichieD on 19th of Feb 2025 at 08:44 am
Steve: When you say you'd like to see a red to green move (XERS for example), can you share where your actual buy point would be? Are you looking for a lower open, then if the stock starts to move up you buy as soon as the candle turns green, or are you looking for a lower open, a move up with the buy point being above the prior day's high? Or something else?
Can anyone give me a
Posted by RichieD on 18th of Feb 2025 at 05:28 pm
Can anyone give me a technical read on SGN? Looks like it hit bottom late January at just under $2.00/share, daily volume in low 100,000's. Had a one-day move closing at $4.50 (intraday high of $7.50) on volume of $100 million shares. Has drifted back since closing today at $2.13/share on 103,000 shares traded. Is this likely to pop again? Is it likely that volume comes in? I have no idea what that 100 million shares was about on a single day.
Steve, If the 10 Year
10 Year Yield 4.725%
Posted by RichieD on 8th of Jan 2025 at 09:19 am
Steve, If the 10 Year Yield were to reach 5%, would you deem it a reasonable place to park some longterm money not earmarked for investment? What are the downside risks, if any?
Why? Retest of breakout?
My guess is SLV has 29.50 to 30 area as ...
Posted by RichieD on 22nd of Oct 2024 at 07:47 am
Why? Retest of breakout?
Not quite sure what you're
Fed fund futures now pricing in 40% chance of 50 ...
Posted by RichieD on 13th of Sep 2024 at 07:45 am
Not quite sure what you're referring to. Reported CPI year over year for July was 2.9%; CPI year over year for August was 2.5%. That's a fairly low number considering CPI peaked at 9.1% in 2022. If you feel the numbers aren't to be trusted, that's different and you wouldn't get an argument from me. But as presented, the August CPI reported a few days ago does not appear to be high.
Novel idea: Wait for the
Pre Market
Posted by RichieD on 22nd of Aug 2024 at 09:53 am
Novel idea: Wait for the actual data before reporting instead of surveying businesses and extrapolating.
Gold trading at $2526 this
Posted by RichieD on 16th of Aug 2024 at 11:15 am
Gold trading at $2526 this morning. Miners trading at levels that were last seen when gold was at $1700-$1800. I just don't get it. I know mining expenses have increased somewhat in recent years, but energy prices are nearly the same. All I heard years ago was that once gold went to all-time highs the mining stocks would explode. Well it has and they haven't...but why? In my opinion, the miners should be double where they are at present based upon today's gold price. Where am I wrong?
Thanks, Steve. Is that assessment
Market has priced in lower inflation - focus on the ...
Posted by RichieD on 14th of Aug 2024 at 09:47 am
Thanks, Steve. Is that assessment based upon the market's reaction to this morning's inflation number or were there earlier signs over the past few weeks?
Tuesday's newsletter? I do not
Posted by RichieD on 19th of Jun 2024 at 07:21 am
Tuesday's newsletter? I do not see a link to last night's newsletter, either in the newsletter calendar section or in the trading community. With Matt away was there an announcement to skip it that I missed?
Since you put "experts" in
Market might be pricing in successful lawfare with the outcome ...
Posted by RichieD on 31st of May 2024 at 12:22 pm
Since you put "experts" in quotes, I take it you are skeptical of their analysis and have a different take altogether. I managed a major law firm for more than 35 years before retiring 3 years ago. Every lawyer I know (there are many - highly educated and well versed in the law) agrees with the main stream media analysis...as did all 12 jurors...rather quickly.
Would love to know what you believe was strange about the trial. Feel free to send me an email. My apology if I read you wrong.
Still don't understand why you
AZ chart
Posted by RichieD on 31st of May 2024 at 12:06 pm
Still don't understand why you and Steve have stuck with this stock all the way down. It's the antithesis of everything you do on this site.
You do...do an a hell
FUTU, AQST
Posted by RichieD on 24th of Apr 2024 at 08:40 am
You do...do an a hell of a job, Matt...Steve does too! Thank you both. I am a far better trader for having stumbled across BPT years ago. You can't be all things to everyone, so don't try.
Completely agree that seasonally adjusted
"Literally Gas Lighting": The Hilarious Reason For Today's PPI Miss: Seasonally Adjusted Gas Prices
Posted by RichieD on 12th of Apr 2024 at 07:18 am
Completely agree that seasonally adjusted numbers are "gas lighting". That said, this is not a "Biden thing" as the Zero Hedge author would have the reader believe. The fiddling has been going on for decades, during both Democrat and Republican administrations. I'm not excusing it - the concept is a farce and highly manipulative - just pointing out it's bipartisan.
That said, in my opinion the Zero Hedge author has his own agenda and that's what weakens his overall point and disappoints. He too manipulates the reader by his characterizations of the numbers. For example, why is it that a .1% miss on the CPI to the upside makes for a "hotter " than expected number (the implication being that it's a disaster), but a .1% miss to the downside on the PPI (which we know is inaccurate but putting that aside) is characterized as the "smallest possible miss"? The answer is obvious.
Gold up $47 this morning
Posted by RichieD on 21st of Mar 2024 at 09:22 am
Gold up $47 this morning at $2208...GDX up $0.35 at $30.26 in pre-market trading. WTF will it take to see the mining stocks make an NVDA-type move??
I'm struggling to find the
Posted by RichieD on 12th of Mar 2024 at 02:30 pm
I'm struggling to find the right entry point for KISS system trades. Have set my favorites but when I receive an email alert, more often than not the stock has already made a big move. That makes me hesitate. Yesterday for example, I received an email for JD after it moved up 15% on the day. Today it gapped higher again on the open. Chasing those type of moves does not sit well with me, even ones with a smaller % move at the outset.
I understand KISS is a trending following system identifying stocks that may move higher for months, but the initial entries seem exceedingly high relative to the initial STS. I struggle making the adjustment since my plays for years have been tied to BPT trade ideas, the majority of which rely upon a breakout from a pattern.
Any suggestions?
KISS System question: Maybe I
Posted by RichieD on 26th of Feb 2024 at 09:37 am
KISS System question: Maybe I missed it, but how does one determine a good entry point for these trades? Unlike the "trade ideas" that usually have a clearly defined breakpoint, or level of support, the KISS trades generally do not. Do I hope for a pullback closer to the 1st STS, or do I just jump in?
If I'm at the computer
I took a position in CIB yesterday based on KISS ...
Posted by RichieD on 25th of Feb 2024 at 04:31 pm
If I'm at the computer trading stocks intraday, I tend to use a 5 minute chart for my entry. In my opinion, patterns and breaking of resistance levels in this timeframe offer up reliable entry points. When and where to exit a position (placing the right stop) is more difficult to gauge; still working on that. I tend to play high beta stocks. Being a skeptic by nature I often place my stops too tight. Reducing position size allows me to place wider stops. Learning through experience; there's no better way.