I don't mind it. I am still leaning toward the text.
It is still just the how does it morph from the pending trade to
an official. Two table, highlighted Yellow while pending and
then removed when triggered. Maybe a field for some title
like "Position" and that would say either Pending or
Confirmed? I guess maybe I like the text, IDK.
Tom. There would be no need to change the table until the
next trade notification is announced. For instance, let's
imagine this trade goes through today. Tomorrow you could
display the same table. The only modification would be to
remove the "NOTE". Tomorrow this table would communicate the
status of the "current trade". When we get the notification
to close the trade the table will change to reflect that.
And obviously there would be no table when there's no pending or
current trade.
I would handle a 2nd entry of the Multi system by adding a Trade
2 table above the Trade 1 table. Same format. I can do
some mock-ups of different examples if you guys are interested.
Well I think we are going to first send an email to say we are
thinking about not sending out anymore emails and that we will send
an email to confirm.
With the table. We truly have received feedback overload
and frankly there is not much of a preference one way or the other
- it seems to pretty much even out. We will have to review
and brainstorm what will work best in conjunction with IT and the
back-end system and make the decision. I have you past posts
with tables and we will have to work through it.
Matt, I suggest re-wording " SPY
SPY Trade Alert
Posted by ascr on 20th of May 2011 at 02:14 pm
Matt, I suggest re-wording " SPY needs to close between $134.20 and below $134.39 (see notes below) "
to read:
SPY needs to close above $134.20 and below $134.39 (see notes below)
Definately easier to understand worded
Posted by dougwur on 20th of May 2011 at 02:23 pm
Definately easier to understand worded like ascr posted!
unfortunately I can't edit my
Posted by ascr on 20th of May 2011 at 02:26 pm
unfortunately I can't edit my post any more to display the correct info.
I don't mind it. I
Posted by tom on 20th of May 2011 at 02:19 pm
I don't mind it. I am still leaning toward the text.
It is still just the how does it morph from the pending trade to an official. Two table, highlighted Yellow while pending and then removed when triggered. Maybe a field for some title like "Position" and that would say either Pending or Confirmed? I guess maybe I like the text, IDK.
Tom. There would be no
Posted by ascr on 20th of May 2011 at 02:39 pm
Tom. There would be no need to change the table until the next trade notification is announced. For instance, let's imagine this trade goes through today. Tomorrow you could display the same table. The only modification would be to remove the "NOTE". Tomorrow this table would communicate the status of the "current trade". When we get the notification to close the trade the table will change to reflect that.
And obviously there would be no table when there's no pending or current trade.
I would handle a 2nd entry of the Multi system by adding a Trade 2 table above the Trade 1 table. Same format. I can do some mock-ups of different examples if you guys are interested.
I would have to say:
Posted by matt on 20th of May 2011 at 02:19 pm
I would have to say: SPY needs to close above $134.19 and below $134.40, not $134.20 and $134.39
Price closes above $134.19, or between $134.20 and $134.39
otherwise I'm not sending out another email, we get enough complaints/confusion as it is and I have to send another email later anyway
emails
Posted by jdwm on 20th of May 2011 at 02:32 pm
LOL!
Posted by cal1 on 20th of May 2011 at 03:37 pm
LOL!
Well I think we are
Posted by tom on 20th of May 2011 at 02:38 pm
Well I think we are going to first send an email to say we are thinking about not sending out anymore emails and that we will send an email to confirm.
You guys are awesome! Truly.
Posted by ascr on 20th of May 2011 at 02:41 pm
You guys are awesome! Truly.
With the table. We truly
Posted by tom on 20th of May 2011 at 02:49 pm
With the table. We truly have received feedback overload and frankly there is not much of a preference one way or the other - it seems to pretty much even out. We will have to review and brainstorm what will work best in conjunction with IT and the back-end system and make the decision. I have you past posts with tables and we will have to work through it.
Guess what I am doing this weekend
Uh Oh. Matt, based on
Posted by ascr on 20th of May 2011 at 02:28 pm
Uh Oh. Matt, based on your last post you need to change your blog sticky to say "below $134.40"