Thoughts/Questions

    Posted by tom on 17th of May 2011 at 04:16 pm

    We are debating the table idea but the problem remains what to do with the pending trade.  So we put the pending trade in the table and then remove it after the close if it does not trigger?  I gotta say that I think people might have an issue with understanding that, at least at first. I can already hear the "well I logged in and saw the trade in the table...".  Do all of you really think that would work for you and it would be clear for you?  I don't ask that antagonistically but honestly.  We will work to give you what you want but we are trying to manage many behind the scenes variables which come into play and frankly we have experienced members jumping the gun and overreacting a bit.

    An example, we had someone log into the system and it said your not current signed up so add a membership etc.  You know, the disclaimer - you likely have had it happen before.  Well because it said buy a membership or add a membership they bought SPY.

    pdani:

    The Current Trade tab is meant to be the one stop shop.  Why there is redundancy is because we post in 1 spot for everything (besides the SPY blog).  It is actually quite efficient and productive for us.  One click sends to the email, SMS, posts to the website etc.  Want us to move the Current Trade tab out of the individual system's tabs and have it somewhere else?

    I believe we do a more than adequate job answering questions.  If there were less questions then I think we could be even faster at answering the ones that come in.  My recommendation for answering questions is this: Post on the blog, the community is very helpful but to ensure your request doesn't get overlooked and eventually end up on a back page also PM myself or Matt OR go to the Contact page and send in a question for the SPY System.  If you get the answer immediately from the post then your good, if not there should be no reason for you to not get a response from the team from the Contact form.

    OK, Recap:

    1. Do you want the table and then have the alerts there even if they are pending?  Want a pending table and a triggered table (man that seems like so much for one signal)?  Others?

    2. Want the Current Trade tab taken out and placed somewhere else?  pdani I realize you want to auto-refresh the page.  That is a problem with the tabs because they are applications inside the page but IT now published the current GDX prices on the GDX page, we might be able, especially if there is a table, have them post it somewhere where it can auto-refresh and be refreshed.  Do you like that idea?

    3. Feel free to utilize the board but think about doubling up and asking the question through the Contact form to help ensure you get a BPT sanctioned response.

    We are open and not so arrogant to think we got it perfect the first time but if people don't share you will end up with what the squeaky wheel wants and that may not serve you best.  We will almost assuredly not be able to fulfill every idea or request but we are open to all reasonable ideas and requests. 

    do it

    thanx

    How about something simple like...

    Posted by mamaduck on 17th of May 2011 at 08:44 pm

    a simple table that when in cash, shows in Cash (first picture)

    And when the various stages trigger or are about to trigger, you fill them out (2nd picture)? 

    Once the trade is complete, you can replace it with the system in Cash set up...

    excellent!

    Posted by rgaiti on 18th of May 2011 at 08:19 am

    IMO the current facility is

    Posted by iwedat on 17th of May 2011 at 07:54 pm

    IMO the current facility is fairly simple and easy to apply though I don't mind the idea of a sticky at the top that reads the same as the email alert.

    Further i think having access to the CURRENT TRADE tab at the top of this page would be handy too.

    Another angle is having stickys do what the CURRENT TRADE tab does but could be colour coded and worded simply.

    EG stickys at the top would firstly be alerts orange (PENDING?) until they are green light for 'ON' (trade entered) or red light and 'OFF' (in cash) with normal entry exit stipulation. Lose outdated stickys as new ones are added.

    Not sure about the refresh hurdle though i think focus on the email alerts should be priority.

     

    I don't think you should

    Posted by cemerman on 17th of May 2011 at 06:39 pm

    I don't think you should put pending trades in a table. Your communication includes an e-mail, SMS text if you sign up for it, and the current trade tab.

    Buy if SPY closes < XXX.XX is clear enough.

    I agree - it's good just the way it is.

    Posted by jaycrockett on 17th of May 2011 at 06:46 pm

    thoughts/opinions

    Posted by meaghan on 17th of May 2011 at 04:46 pm

    I may be an outlier but I don't see any need for big changes.

     We get the SPY system e mail alert, we check the website under the current trade tab and follow the instruction. The only thing that could be tightened up is the language of the trade instruction. I think that is what caused this recent dust-up.

    That should be easy to correct, as I think only one word caused the confusion.

    Title: Thoughts/Questions (previous)

    What about the Watch List Table?

    Posted by CopperMtn on 17th of May 2011 at 04:42 pm

    I think the format and alerts on the current general community Watch List works well. Is there a way that can be adapted for the SPY system? In other words, SPY system members would be able to click into the SPY System from the left nav and have the default tab be a "watch list" table that would have one line for Single Entry System and 4 lines for Multi Entry System. Alerts for untriggered trades (assuming a trade was imminent) could flash like they currently do. The untriggered section would be blank if a trade was not imminent. Similarly, there could be a triggered trade section for both Single and Multi Entry Systems underneath. 

    I also would want the sticky note to appear in the SPY System Blog as well as the emails and SMS messages to continue. This watchlist approach would provide in a single left nav click all the info we need.

    Thoughts?

    I think that there should

    Posted by algyros on 17th of May 2011 at 04:32 pm

    I think that there should be one setting for each system (single entry and multiple entry):  Current Position.  If a trade is pending, then place it on that table and lable it as pending, something like:  "Long if SPY closes at or below 130."  Then, when the trade has triggered or not, change the text to indicate that, so that it reads "In Cash," or "Long SPY from 130."

    The multiple entry table would be the same, except that it would indicate the current entry and subsequent entries.  

    Sell and short signals would work the same.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!