My bad, you said it much better. Would it be proper to say
that
MA(20) defines the short-term trend, MA(50) defines the
intermediate-term trend and MA(200) defines the long-term trend? (A
"golden" cross then ensures that both inter-mediate and long-term
trends are either confirmed bullish or confirmed bearish, for
example.)
So, is MA(20) on daily charts a watershed line between up-move
and down-move in this situation? On the $SPX MA(20)=1125 is the
(last) support for the bulls that was mentioned many times in
intraday updates. I am trying to figure out a general principle
here. Thanks for any practical knowledge in this regard.
Investors Business Daily recommends using MA(50) in this
situation, however, on many stocks it is quite far from the current
prices.
perth, you are most likely right. What troubles me that we still
have not reached the targets for the $USD ( MA(50) and have not
retraced much of the $gold's decline). Therefore, I'd venture to
say that we are still in wave B and have not seen its highs yet.
Perhaps, next week like you projected earlier.
perth, I could count two waves completed recently, 4 altogether,
and today is wave 5 down. Watch $USD, 77.18 or above would mean
that wave 3 up has started. Probably 49.85 is as high gdx could
possibly go up.
rp, I like your plan for SRS, it's a low risk/reward trade. I
missed your posts :-) Thanks for sharing your ideas. I bet this
drop is not the one and the uptrendline will stand for one more
time. Good luck to you!
rp, whoo hoo! Let us know when you go for it. I've been holding
IYR short since December 30 at 48.70, I have not been stopped out,
it looks like your plan may work well.
I worked for the last census in 2000 and was paid $10/hour. the
sentiment was more favorable to the government back then. Probably
$25/hour is the minimum that I would consider doing it, if I were
totally broke and needed _that_ kind of money badly. People could
lash out at you now, just because you do it for the government.
It's not pretty.
Yeah, another episode of government conspiracy in action, this
time to start a way with Yemen or something. Government is full of
lawyers, who reverse facts and fundamentals in order to justify
their action. By reversing their stories and the chain of
causalities, one could see what really happened.
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
The community is delayed by three days for non registered users.
Thanks for the update, that's
Mid Day By Paulenoff on $USD and GLD
Posted by junkie on 15th of Jan 2010 at 02:20 pm
Thanks for the update, that's what I suspected: $USD broke its resistance at 77.18
My bad, you said it
Shorting CAAS
Posted by junkie on 15th of Jan 2010 at 02:49 am
My bad, you said it much better. Would it be proper to say that
MA(20) defines the short-term trend, MA(50) defines the intermediate-term trend and MA(200) defines the long-term trend? (A "golden" cross then ensures that both inter-mediate and long-term trends are either confirmed bullish or confirmed bearish, for example.)
So, is MA(20) on daily
Shorting CAAS
Posted by junkie on 14th of Jan 2010 at 09:54 pm
So, is MA(20) on daily charts a watershed line between up-move and down-move in this situation? On the $SPX MA(20)=1125 is the (last) support for the bulls that was mentioned many times in intraday updates. I am trying to figure out a general principle here. Thanks for any practical knowledge in this regard.
Investors Business Daily recommends using MA(50) in this situation, however, on many stocks it is quite far from the current prices.
Shorting CAAS
Posted by junkie on 14th of Jan 2010 at 09:30 pm
It looks like CAAS is in its wave 2 or in early wave 3 down. Any suggestion for a good short entry point? EMA(84)=23.87 on 15-minute charts?
Similarly, CSIQ is definitely in its wave 3 down, with wave 1 being completed today. Any suggestion on this beast (I don't have much luck trading it)?
It looks to me that
GDX
Posted by junkie on 14th of Jan 2010 at 08:09 pm
It looks to me that way on the dailies.
above 1150 or below?
1150 SPX by Friday expiration? ZeroHedge
Posted by junkie on 13th of Jan 2010 at 05:39 pm
Then to give those guys a big loss, market should move down, not up. The last time I checked the max pain number was 112 on SPY.
Which indirectly supports my point:
Market to top in Dec 2010 then bottom in 2014
Posted by junkie on 12th of Jan 2010 at 08:13 pm
Which indirectly supports my point: those books have been intentionally hidden to prevent discovery of the truth.
perth, you are most likely
GDX ratio
Posted by junkie on 12th of Jan 2010 at 08:09 pm
perth, you are most likely right. What troubles me that we still have not reached the targets for the $USD ( MA(50) and have not retraced much of the $gold's decline). Therefore, I'd venture to say that we are still in wave B and have not seen its highs yet. Perhaps, next week like you projected earlier.
1970s or 1840-70s? Have you
Market to top in Dec 2010 then bottom in 2014
Posted by junkie on 12th of Jan 2010 at 07:45 pm
1970s or 1840-70s? Have you got books from those times? There are multiple cylces going, so Mr Jones is partially right. And partially wrong.
GDX ratio, correction
GDX ratio
Posted by junkie on 12th of Jan 2010 at 05:44 pm
correction, 2 completed waves on the 60-minute charts, and this is the beginning of wave 3 down. Then any bounces of GDX should be shortable.
perth, I could count two
GDX ratio
Posted by junkie on 12th of Jan 2010 at 05:27 pm
perth, I could count two waves completed recently, 4 altogether, and today is wave 5 down. Watch $USD, 77.18 or above would mean that wave 3 up has started. Probably 49.85 is as high gdx could possibly go up.
SRS trade
Posted by junkie on 12th of Jan 2010 at 04:17 pm
rp, I like your plan for SRS, it's a low risk/reward trade. I missed your posts :-) Thanks for sharing your ideas. I bet this drop is not the one and the uptrendline will stand for one more time. Good luck to you!
rp, whoo hoo! Let us
Posted by junkie on 12th of Jan 2010 at 03:12 pm
rp, whoo hoo! Let us know when you go for it. I've been holding IYR short since December 30 at 48.70, I have not been stopped out, it looks like your plan may work well.
perth, I concur. The max
gdx needs another drop?
Posted by junkie on 12th of Jan 2010 at 03:09 pm
perth, I concur. The max pain on GDX is at 47, last time it worked to a tee in December.
Sorry for posting an unrelated
Withholding Tax Increase
Posted by junkie on 12th of Jan 2010 at 01:30 pm
Sorry for posting an unrelated comment intraday.
macnsc, Thank you very much for this link, this is the clearest explanation I've seen so far.
I worked for the last
US Dollar and Jobs
Posted by junkie on 8th of Jan 2010 at 10:35 am
I worked for the last census in 2000 and was paid $10/hour. the sentiment was more favorable to the government back then. Probably $25/hour is the minimum that I would consider doing it, if I were totally broke and needed _that_ kind of money badly. People could lash out at you now, just because you do it for the government. It's not pretty.
trade individual gold stocks, not the BPGDM
BPGDM
Posted by junkie on 8th of Jan 2010 at 09:45 am
BVN has retraced almost 61% of its decline, while BPGDM has barely moved up. Trade your individual stocks instead of the index, it seems.
JASO
Posted by junkie on 7th of Jan 2010 at 03:51 pm
Could anyone explain what's happening with JASO? Quiet selling into the strength on its way down or something else?
$gold holds up, so there
GDX sell signals
Posted by junkie on 7th of Jan 2010 at 03:41 pm
$gold holds up, so there is another push higher to come, IMO.
Title: OT, another government fake-out
OT,airplane bombing terrorists
Posted by junkie on 7th of Jan 2010 at 03:37 pm
Yeah, another episode of government conspiracy in action, this time to start a way with Yemen or something. Government is full of lawyers, who reverse facts and fundamentals in order to justify their action. By reversing their stories and the chain of causalities, one could see what really happened.