Its not a text book buy with divergence etc yet but its way away
from the 9EMA, oversold and also volume in the half day on Friday
looks almost exhaustive compared to yesterdays full day trading
I shorted in Silver on Monday and its doing
quite well.
Separately, I have shorted Sugar this morning. I think its
looking like its rolling over technically and in addition, is about
to enter its most weakest seasonal period. I wouldn't short just
based on seasonals but given that technicals are also
rolling over, there is an objective short here that I have
taken this morning.
as far as the metal itself is concerned i think it has another
leg down. i am also short silver as of thursday and looking for a
downward move in the coming week.
Thanks. I have just taken out a long on ZSL which is the silver
inverse. Lets see what this does. My view is that Silver has more
downside in the short term.
I am eyeing up a long position in DGAZ so the ultra short Nat
Gas play. Its up alot today but i think technically nat gas looks
weak given its broken its 200day and macd is pointing down. Also if
you look back historically, July through to Autumn time frame is
weak for Nat Gas.
to be honest, this is the way the market works. Its a forward
pricing mechanism hence the time to buy is when things are reallly
bad. Typically the time to buy I stress (such as March 09)
to slighly complicate matters, the Fed has its POMO activity
ongoing and this is pumping money into the market and
driving/facilitating a recovery.
Have a look at the Investment Clock in the link below which is
half way down the page. Arguably, we are at point 8 on the
clock
Just a quick question. I like the approach of a confirming
candle in terms of what you have referred to before with the 9EMA.
Do you have any thoughts on how to utilise the confirming candle in
a downtrend? Take sugar for example. The approach I take is to only
short confirmation candles below the 9EMA as the Moving average
structure is clearly downwards
At present, Sugar is giving a 9EMA confirmation buy signal.
Albeit with just this one indicator
Would be interested however to hear your views in the case that
there may be instances you take a trade from a confirming candle on
the long side of a downtrending instrument
I thought you only accepted positive comments Michael.
You have a habitual knack of being hypocritical
Separately to the rest of the community, I am focusing on
objective systems I have coded in Tradestation and there are many
more I would like to write. So I am taking a "sabatical" from this
type of site to focus on where i believe my strengths lie which is
objective trading and not subjective. So good luck to all!!!! (Even
Michael!)
bashing...Matts word originally not mine. In any area in life
whether it be work, sport, social, family or other, sharing
experiences good and bad helps nurture and develop oneself. I share
experiences with my children every day both good and bad. If I only
share good experiences with them, then they will not know the good
from the bad and what to avoid as they develop. I would rather they
learn from my bad experiences or emperical research I have (eg
don't eat too many sweets because it messes up your teeth and you
will end up getting diabetes) rather than them find out after the
event and have only a rear view mirror to look at
Maybe this will explain better the value in providing
information both good and bad on not just this forum but in any
walk of life
show me the stats. Not cherry picked EW Calls but take Prechter
as an example and list out all of his primary calls. Its difficult
to trade from sort ofs
from my side, here are my stats which hopefully helps traders
constructively decide to either use or not use EW. It also begs the
question that if Prechter as an example can't make EW
work.....being as he has an army of people working for him and
lives and breathes it, then what chance does the average investor
have? Not much if any chance at all
so your conclusion Michael is that we should only post on the
blog if we agree with something? Be interesting to hear if anyone
else agrees with this stance. I would have thought fellow traders
would like to know what works and what doesn't. What the heck is
the point in a blog if research and experiences are not shared? You
are heavily outnumbered here given the feedback from other posters
on the value (or otherwise) of EW.
I value not only people saying hey that worked great but equally
outlining things that don't work.
Thanks Russ. This is the type of objective testing which allows
traders to make informed judgements on what is viable and not
viable to use
So the next step is for a trader to take the good work of
Steven, add on one additional variable at a time and retest the
sample size to see if there is any improvement.
My bottom line is that every indicator has its 15seconds of
glory but there is a requirement to objectively test this with
other indicators to identify if there is any winning combination.
Otherwise, there is every likelihood of a classic visual illusion
from reviewing this or other indicators/patterns that so often
happens
Hence my stance on trading objectively and nothing but
objectively
The other question that arises is that I recall the newsletter
mentioning the reliability of the Evening Star pattern as being
high. Under what premise/research was this conclusion made given
what analysis is available here? Not a question for you Russ.
Moreso of an observation
Good post again Russ!
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
The community is delayed by three days for non registered users.
FTNT
Posted by vimal on 3rd of Dec 2013 at 09:59 am
Matt/Steve
What are your views on FTNT as a buy here?
Its not a text book buy with divergence etc yet but its way away from the 9EMA, oversold and also volume in the half day on Friday looks almost exhaustive compared to yesterdays full day trading
Any thoughts or too risky at this stage?
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=FTNT&p=D&yr=0&mn=2&dy=0&id=p36180854157&a=326204234
JBT
Posted by vimal on 27th of Nov 2013 at 09:09 am
Back down to the 9EMA?
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=JBT&p=D&yr=0&mn=2&dy=0&id=p33687927220&a=325530396
JAKK
Posted by vimal on 22nd of Nov 2013 at 02:27 am
Is it fair to say the measured move on JAKK could be to around 8.50 from 6.30 at the moment?
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=JAKK&p=D&yr=0&mn=6&dy=0&id=p13204746628&a=324864818
Palladium
Posted by vimal on 21st of Nov 2013 at 01:41 pm
Steve, is Palladium a buy here on a break up? Appreciate not too much upside to the 9EMA
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=PALL&p=D&yr=0&mn=4&dy=0&id=p07189030081&a=324770955
bullish wedge likely to play
SPX 5 min chart views
Posted by vimal on 25th of Oct 2013 at 12:21 pm
bullish wedge likely to play out or is it a break of a rising trend and backtest kiss before falling?
Sugar
Posted by vimal on 7th of Aug 2013 at 06:42 am
I shorted in Silver on Monday and its doing quite well.
Separately, I have shorted Sugar this morning. I think its looking like its rolling over technically and in addition, is about to enter its most weakest seasonal period. I wouldn't short just based on seasonals but given that technicals are also rolling over, there is an objective short here that I have taken this morning.
as far as the metal
GDX Daily
Posted by vimal on 4th of Aug 2013 at 12:40 pm
as far as the metal itself is concerned i think it has another leg down. i am also short silver as of thursday and looking for a downward move in the coming week.
Thanks. I have just taken
Nat Gas
Posted by vimal on 1st of Aug 2013 at 01:59 pm
Thanks. I have just taken out a long on ZSL which is the silver inverse. Lets see what this does. My view is that Silver has more downside in the short term.
i posted on friday i
Nat Gas
Posted by vimal on 1st of Aug 2013 at 01:15 pm
i posted on friday i was going short nat gas by taking a long in the ultrashort etf dgaz.
its done quite well up 20% since friday. we are hitting the upper end of the rising trend line so i am taking half off and tight trailing the rest.
nat gas wise it will claw back some losses of recent days but i still dont like it here for the next 1-2months timeframe
I am eyeing up a
Hey Matt, any thoughts on NatGas? anyone playing UGAZ or ...
Posted by vimal on 26th of Jul 2013 at 02:28 pm
I am eyeing up a long position in DGAZ so the ultra short Nat Gas play. Its up alot today but i think technically nat gas looks weak given its broken its 200day and macd is pointing down. Also if you look back historically, July through to Autumn time frame is weak for Nat Gas.
So i am inclined to be short
to be honest, this is
im confused, most news articles say that we are in ...
Posted by vimal on 25th of Jul 2013 at 07:04 am
to be honest, this is the way the market works. Its a forward pricing mechanism hence the time to buy is when things are reallly bad. Typically the time to buy I stress (such as March 09)
to slighly complicate matters, the Fed has its POMO activity ongoing and this is pumping money into the market and driving/facilitating a recovery.
Have a look at the Investment Clock in the link below which is half way down the page. Arguably, we are at point 8 on the clock
http://www.bethetop5percent.com/2012/866/know-the-time-on-the-investment-clock/
Sugar 9EMA
Posted by vimal on 23rd of Jul 2013 at 05:32 am
Hi Matt
Just a quick question. I like the approach of a confirming candle in terms of what you have referred to before with the 9EMA. Do you have any thoughts on how to utilise the confirming candle in a downtrend? Take sugar for example. The approach I take is to only short confirmation candles below the 9EMA as the Moving average structure is clearly downwards
At present, Sugar is giving a 9EMA confirmation buy signal. Albeit with just this one indicator
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$SUGAR&p=D&yr=0&mn=9&dy=0&id=p54869772431&a=301894461
Would be interested however to hear your views in the case that there may be instances you take a trade from a confirming candle on the long side of a downtrending instrument
Regards
thankyou
9EMA Whipsaw
Posted by vimal on 5th of Mar 2013 at 11:26 am
thankyou
Title: 9EMA Whipsaw Hi Matt/Steve Just a
Posted by vimal on 5th of Mar 2013 at 10:00 am
Hi Matt/Steve
Just a quick question on the 9EMA Whipsaw method/technique. Probably easier to ask my question via a scenario
The first candle closes above the 9EMA
The second candle also closes above the 9EMA but not above the high of the first candle
The third candle closes above the high of the first candle
Does this warrant a buy or is it based just on the second candle and how this behaves? Hope this makes sense
It goes without saying I am extracting one segment from an overall strategy here rather than just using 9EMA as a stand alone strategy
Kind Regards
I thought you only accepted
this really isn't meant politically. I've got nothing to say ...
Posted by vimal on 3rd of Apr 2011 at 08:52 am
I thought you only accepted positive comments Michael.
You have a habitual knack of being hypocritical
Separately to the rest of the community, I am focusing on objective systems I have coded in Tradestation and there are many more I would like to write. So I am taking a "sabatical" from this type of site to focus on where i believe my strengths lie which is objective trading and not subjective. So good luck to all!!!! (Even Michael!)
In the cycle, QQQ over
Fractured market
Posted by vimal on 1st of Apr 2011 at 03:38 am
In the cycle, QQQ over a sustained period rising faster than the SPYs or DIAs is bullish so I would expect SPYs and DIAs to play catch up
bashing...Matts word originally not mine.
OK guys
Posted by vimal on 31st of Mar 2011 at 10:44 am
bashing...Matts word originally not mine. In any area in life whether it be work, sport, social, family or other, sharing experiences good and bad helps nurture and develop oneself. I share experiences with my children every day both good and bad. If I only share good experiences with them, then they will not know the good from the bad and what to avoid as they develop. I would rather they learn from my bad experiences or emperical research I have (eg don't eat too many sweets because it messes up your teeth and you will end up getting diabetes) rather than them find out after the event and have only a rear view mirror to look at
Maybe this will explain better the value in providing information both good and bad on not just this forum but in any walk of life
Title: stats show me the stats.
OK guys
Posted by vimal on 31st of Mar 2011 at 09:45 am
show me the stats. Not cherry picked EW Calls but take Prechter as an example and list out all of his primary calls. Its difficult to trade from sort ofs
from my side, here are my stats which hopefully helps traders constructively decide to either use or not use EW. It also begs the question that if Prechter as an example can't make EW work.....being as he has an army of people working for him and lives and breathes it, then what chance does the average investor have? Not much if any chance at all
http://www.erictyson.com/articles/20090616
Title: summary so your conclusion Michael
OK guys
Posted by vimal on 31st of Mar 2011 at 09:26 am
so your conclusion Michael is that we should only post on the blog if we agree with something? Be interesting to hear if anyone else agrees with this stance. I would have thought fellow traders would like to know what works and what doesn't. What the heck is the point in a blog if research and experiences are not shared? You are heavily outnumbered here given the feedback from other posters on the value (or otherwise) of EW.
I value not only people saying hey that worked great but equally outlining things that don't work.
Thanks Russ. This is the
Bidu??
Posted by vimal on 31st of Mar 2011 at 06:35 am
Thanks Russ. This is the type of objective testing which allows traders to make informed judgements on what is viable and not viable to use
So the next step is for a trader to take the good work of Steven, add on one additional variable at a time and retest the sample size to see if there is any improvement.
My bottom line is that every indicator has its 15seconds of glory but there is a requirement to objectively test this with other indicators to identify if there is any winning combination. Otherwise, there is every likelihood of a classic visual illusion from reviewing this or other indicators/patterns that so often happens
Hence my stance on trading objectively and nothing but objectively
The other question that arises is that I recall the newsletter mentioning the reliability of the Evening Star pattern as being high. Under what premise/research was this conclusion made given what analysis is available here? Not a question for you Russ. Moreso of an observation
Good post again Russ!