"I am certain that there

    California vs Texas

    Posted by bullbull on 12th of Jul 2009 at 10:31 pm

    "I am certain that there will be a next leg down for many reasons.  One reason is that virtually every economist and analyst who predicted this financial crisis in the first place, predicts that it is no over".


    first, it is wrong to use "certain" in predicting market, it is naive.

    second, you can't trust any economist on predicting the market, the economy and market is not in sync. the economy can still be bad, but a bull market can be born way early than economy recover.

    third, let me just show you some example on several great "bear" who turns bullish

    (1).  doug kass calls the bottom

    (2).  one of the best in business : Jeremy Grantham calls re-invest when terrified:

    (3). Barry Ritholtz calls rally

    March 9th is a "generation" low, in Kass' s words, it is a darn good entry point. Of course, nobody knew for sure. But trying to be a fake "contrarian" and thinking the panic is not yet over is just what majority people is doing, as shown by the cash level on the side line.

    anyway, I would like to quit the discussion. Just pay a little attention to the fundamental, not just draw lines on the chart and trying to predict the market going, it is not going to pay off in a big way.

     

      you are arguing that there

    Posted by matt on 13th of Jul 2009 at 12:15 am

     

    you are arguing that there are no certainties in the market, and I totally agree with you, but per your argument you need to follow your own logic, you should instead be saying  "well I think this is a bull market because of A,B, and C and therefore I disagree with you guys, but I could be wrong because there are no certainties".  But instead you seem to be arguing with certainty that this is a bull market, even though you said there are no certainties. You are contradicting your logic.

     

    For me the charts say otherwise, I think to odds favor this as being a bear market rally.  Again that is not certain, there are only probabilites in the market, but that's what I see as being the most probable case based on my analysis.  Just like in quantum physics, i.e. a particle does not have a set postion or velocity, there are only probabilties, not certainties.  

    "Just like in quantum physics,

    Posted by jtverr on 13th of Jul 2009 at 07:07 am

    "Just like in quantum physics, i.e. a particle does not have a set postion or velocity, there are only probabilties, not certainties."

    Matt,

    Don't forget the 6-factor formula for neutrons!!! Laughing 

    lolol yeah I forgot about

    Posted by matt on 13th of Jul 2009 at 07:27 am

    lolol yeah I forgot about that one!  It's been a while since I had those classes

    Ok, my A, B, C on Bull market case

    Posted by bullbull on 13th of Jul 2009 at 01:36 am

    I'll just list the reasoning for bullish case:

    (a). Oct/Nov VIX spike is hisotric spike in record, the March low associated with lower VIX, it shows market volitilty abating. Does anyone imagine another LEH failing give global financial system a shoke? Very unlikely.

    (b). This is not a "Great Depression"! The US economy was cut in half during the 1929-1932, do you imagine this case happen again, NO. Even the most bearish economist predict slow recovery in 2010. Other than great depression, all the rest of the crash is %50. This time is NOT different from other time. We've seen worst times.

    (c). The P/E10 is ~12 in March low. However, there is enough reasons that why it is not as long as 1930 and 1970~ bear market low. For example, 1970 market has huge interest rate, and no monteory policy being applied. So we can argue you won't see signal digital P/E10 this time.

    (d). don't underestimate government money printing and stimulus, it buys time for economy recovery.

    (e). this is global economy, even we have a sluggish 2009, the world wide economy is back on its footing 2010.

    Could we in a new bull market? maybe, but we also could be on a choppy trending market, and you can expect normal return. It is very unlikely we will hit a March low again. Just my opinion, based on some fundamental reasoning.

    People always try to be "contrarian", it is hard to be a "real one". When you see most of people in blog is bearish.. you get to be wondering: which side is actually the "true" contrarian.

    I don't know how EW can forecast the future. Just try to unwind the historic Dow and S&P chart to 1970 (if you use telechart), and try to predict what will happen, you will find it is never easy to predict what NEXT.

    Bullbull,Why not just make it

    Posted by shamutooth on 13th of Jul 2009 at 09:24 am

    Bullbull,Why not just make it simple? Ignore everyone's opinion because that's all it is  and use Matt's KISS 13/34 crossover on the weekly chart.It's worked very well going way back to even the Great Depression.So,if this is going to be a horrible time as in past post credit bubble contractions,you're protected.If we go up from here,buy the cross and then hold for possibly years.It's that simple and you get best of both worlds without guessing which camp to be in.

    discussion ended.  the next time

    Posted by Michael on 12th of Jul 2009 at 11:06 pm

    discussion ended.  the next time stock prices hit the March 9th lows -- which they will --  you load up.  good luck with that.  

    bullbull, there were quite a

    Posted by rgoodwin on 12th of Jul 2009 at 11:03 pm

    bullbull, there were quite a few replies to your posts from the other day and all you come up with is a pointing to some economists and their call to the end of the crash. Then you say you want to pay attention to the fundamentals and not just draw a few lines on the charts. FWIW - BPT has made a lot of people a lot of money by drawing a few lines on the charts. Personally, I have traded from those lines and damn happy I did - they beat the hell out of any fundamental I could have found anywhere. The fundamentals don't work in this kind of market. That's what mutual fund money managers always talk about and if you can show me one of those guys that has made thier clients money in the past 18 months - equivalent to the technically analyzed and determined trade recommendations of Matt and Steve, then I will buy you dinner. Again, I think you are maybe a trader in a mess and needing some help and guidance. Best to keep arguments to a minimum and take a couple weeks to learn from some of the best in the business.

    Best of luck to you.

    Title: reply "I think you are

    Posted by bullbull on 12th of Jul 2009 at 11:31 pm
    Title: reply

      Guys let's keep the blog

    Posted by matt on 12th of Jul 2009 at 11:39 pm

     

    Guys let's keep the blog conducive to trading ideas, and analysis please! The Blog is a good place, let's not let it degrade into pissing matches.

    Why my post is deleted?

    Posted by bullbull on 13th of Jul 2009 at 12:14 pm

    My reply to rgoodwin is delted, why? This is not free of speech forum?

     

    http://www.fluctu8.com/media/24742/39506/

    Here is what the chart telling you in the verge of the bear market... :)

    Your post was not deleted,

    Posted by matt on 13th of Jul 2009 at 12:30 pm

    Your post was not deleted, look again, it was consensed to an expanding title

    bullbull

    Posted by rgoodwin on 13th of Jul 2009 at 12:28 pm

    It is not deleted - it was reformatted - simply click through the toggles and you will find the reply. Sometimes on longer posts, I think Matt tries to shorten them up by putting them on a toggle or attachment. But on what you just posted - you can click the toggles - it is there. FWIW - I do not intend to reply.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!