Posted by DigiNomad on 15th of Apr 2024 at 05:35 pm
Interesting. Thanks for the info! If using EMA's vs SMA's,
it's basically sitting on the 200 now and clearly the relative
strength was good today. I'm not eager to stick my neck out
though. Maybe I'll play it with a much tighter stop and replay it
later if I'm wrong.
yeah the EMA vs SMS is always a debate. Lot's of folks use EMA's
these days, I use them for the MA ribbons and intra day time
frames. Otherwise my general thought is that the 200 day and 50 day
SMA's have been so widely followed for many years that I tend to
use those on the daily time frames over the EMA's. For smaller time
frames, 2hr, 60 min, 15 etc, and for weekly I use EMA's, though the
200 week SMA tends to be important
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
Interesting. Thanks for the info!
XLV - I kind of like the risk reward for ...
Posted by DigiNomad on 15th of Apr 2024 at 05:35 pm
Interesting. Thanks for the info! If using EMA's vs SMA's, it's basically sitting on the 200 now and clearly the relative strength was good today. I'm not eager to stick my neck out though. Maybe I'll play it with a much tighter stop and replay it later if I'm wrong.
yeah the EMA vs SMS
Posted by matt on 15th of Apr 2024 at 05:37 pm
yeah the EMA vs SMS is always a debate. Lot's of folks use EMA's these days, I use them for the MA ribbons and intra day time frames. Otherwise my general thought is that the 200 day and 50 day SMA's have been so widely followed for many years that I tend to use those on the daily time frames over the EMA's. For smaller time frames, 2hr, 60 min, 15 etc, and for weekly I use EMA's, though the 200 week SMA tends to be important