Posted by shinings on 21st of Apr 2020 at 12:52 pm
Matt, in the future can you send sub system entries and exits,
even though other systems may be in a trade? I remember you said
multiple sub systems could do different things and thus coexist.
This will help investors like us make decisions on whether to
add/reduce positions. Thanks.
IKD - in the end I've struggled to figure out what's best. I
grouped a lot of the systems into 6 charts (9 short sub systems all
one one chart) so only one short system can occur at one time, then
a bunch of long sub systems on another chart, and the 4 other
charts containing 1 sub system each that rarely trigger. I've done
that to limit the number of trades.
however the other option is to just send out all orders for all
sub systems, realize there will be a LOT more trades, times when 3,
4, even 5 or 6 sub system could be in trades, it might be
overwhelming. The only logic of that would be that they are all
their own individual systems, so let them go where they may. Though
for folks with small accounts it's too much to try and trade all
those, and it's probably really confusing that way. So I don't know
about that yet man
Posted by rfmathis on 21st of Apr 2020 at 01:53 pm
I agree, it is hard to argue with the current process. Too
many open SPY System trades would be confusing; and, a lot of
notifications coming out from Matt.
Posted by elementsix on 21st of Apr 2020 at 02:02 pm
Very much agree that the
current SPY System process is excellent.Getting
some anecdotal info on the sub systems is nice but it would be
overwhelming to balance a potential 5-10 open system trades.
Matt, in the future can
SPY systems update
Posted by shinings on 21st of Apr 2020 at 12:52 pm
Matt, in the future can you send sub system entries and exits, even though other systems may be in a trade? I remember you said multiple sub systems could do different things and thus coexist. This will help investors like us make decisions on whether to add/reduce positions. Thanks.
IKD - in the end
Posted by matt on 21st of Apr 2020 at 01:03 pm
IKD - in the end I've struggled to figure out what's best. I grouped a lot of the systems into 6 charts (9 short sub systems all one one chart) so only one short system can occur at one time, then a bunch of long sub systems on another chart, and the 4 other charts containing 1 sub system each that rarely trigger. I've done that to limit the number of trades.
however the other option is to just send out all orders for all sub systems, realize there will be a LOT more trades, times when 3, 4, even 5 or 6 sub system could be in trades, it might be overwhelming. The only logic of that would be that they are all their own individual systems, so let them go where they may. Though for folks with small accounts it's too much to try and trade all those, and it's probably really confusing that way. So I don't know about that yet man
It's hard to argue with
Posted by retirefire on 21st of Apr 2020 at 01:26 pm
It's hard to argue with the success as is, considering your fine tune of the early long that is still open
I agree, it is hard
Posted by rfmathis on 21st of Apr 2020 at 01:53 pm
I agree, it is hard to argue with the current process. Too many open SPY System trades would be confusing; and, a lot of notifications coming out from Matt.
Very much agree that the
Posted by elementsix on 21st of Apr 2020 at 02:02 pm
Very much agree that the current SPY System process is excellent.Getting some anecdotal info on the sub systems is nice but it would be overwhelming to balance a potential 5-10 open system trades.
yeah I would need a
Posted by matt on 21st of Apr 2020 at 01:57 pm
yeah I would need a clone, hard to keep up