Posted by lessarda on 29th of Sep 2011 at 01:18 pm
my only request (and you know I don't pm anyone about alerts,
etc.) is that once there is the likelihood of a trade that the
range be included even if it seems too far away from current prices
to be relevant. We've had a couple of days like this last close out
where the system came within $0.25 or so of doing or not doing a
trade, and we didn't know that secondary # until afterward. These
markets move enough to bring wide ranges into play and it would
help to know where the next on or off switch is. Not asking for
why, just where...thanks for all the hard work from all of you.
Matt later recanted that statement and deleted the post.
The system was on a sell and thus why I didn't post a level in the
alert, otherwise as before if there are levels to watch we list
them.
Not quite sure what you're responding to here, Tom, but...
It looks as thought the SPY could close out it's ...
Posted by lessarda on 29th of Sep 2011 at 01:18 pm
my only request (and you know I don't pm anyone about alerts, etc.) is that once there is the likelihood of a trade that the range be included even if it seems too far away from current prices to be relevant. We've had a couple of days like this last close out where the system came within $0.25 or so of doing or not doing a trade, and we didn't know that secondary # until afterward. These markets move enough to bring wide ranges into play and it would help to know where the next on or off switch is. Not asking for why, just where...thanks for all the hard work from all of you.
Matt later recanted that statement
Posted by tom on 29th of Sep 2011 at 02:10 pm
Matt later recanted that statement and deleted the post. The system was on a sell and thus why I didn't post a level in the alert, otherwise as before if there are levels to watch we list them.
Are you saying it wasn't accurate?
Posted by lessarda on 29th of Sep 2011 at 02:13 pm
If it was, it was certainly a level to watch.
Yes, his statement after the
Posted by tom on 29th of Sep 2011 at 02:19 pm
Yes, his statement after the close that day was not correct. The mentioned level was of no significance to the trade.
Very good. Thanks.
Posted by lessarda on 29th of Sep 2011 at 02:24 pm