Based on my feelings, April -May 2007 was similar. it was just
as misleading for both sides for 3 or 4 weeks, as I remember.
That's based on my experience of the past 3 years.
Steve, Is it (the LD) complete now? I am missing the
reference of "diagonal". I am sorry but this is confusing. Without
using Elliotese, this looks like a distribution pattern after the
uptrend -- through the up-channel -- was completed. Now it
should form some sort of a rectangle before breaking in earnest to
the downside and retracing the most of its advance, like you said.
That would be a retest of the lows at 1044 or a test of of the
MA(200). Thank you for your time!
Steve, Could you please draw a completed sample pattern for the
leading diagonal? I could visualize it for an up-sloping channel,
like we had in January on $SPX. With a down sloping channel
it's a bit different. I view this leading diagonal as a C down, or
{1} of 3 down. I am not sure what another bullish count -- besides
C down -- it could fit into. Thanks!
It looks like 1002 is still a top -- Matt's chart with a trend
line was enlightening -- and you are expecting wave C to go down to
1073ish, if I follow you. What scenario does it fit into? Thanks
for your comments!
Agree :). Thanks for working out the technical details. To
venture my guess, I'd say the obvious that wave 5 will exceed
1150.45 by a small margin, perhaps up to 1170-1180. I am taking
CSIQ as a model here, with two tops at 32.50 and 33.61.
Now the most profitable task is to guess how far down the
current drop is going to...
rp, yes I referred to SPY. Given the overbought nature of the
market, I don't think it's a one-day pullback either. Thanks for
your comments and take care of your family, as this stalemate is
likely to last into the close.
rp, thanks and pardon my poor phrasing of the question. I was
asking about the targets for the entire move down, perhaps into
Friday. As far as short-term 110.00 is the "line in the sand", and
hopefully we'll close below it. I am joining perth is expecting
1080 minimum on the downside. As far as the bounce, again 110.00
might be the trigger, and we are there now.
Thanks, rp! I've noticed the same retest on the GDX 60-minute
chart, courtesy of Matt. How does the IYM look to you in that
regard? (My target of 32.00 is about to be reached on UYM, if only
I re-entered the trade after the 1044 bottom :( )
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
The community is delayed by three days for non registered users.
Jack Steiman
Posted by junkie on 26th of Feb 2010 at 09:55 am
rp, it's nice to know what you said. Steiman did sound convincing to me, I must admit!
A good description of the leading diagonal pattern
Another Alternative View
Posted by junkie on 26th of Feb 2010 at 09:29 am
http://thepatternsite.com/EWleadingTriangle.html if anybody wishes to read about it
Based on my feelings, April
Oct 1987
Posted by junkie on 25th of Feb 2010 at 05:47 pm
Based on my feelings, April -May 2007 was similar. it was just as misleading for both sides for 3 or 4 weeks, as I remember. That's based on my experience of the past 3 years.
Steve, Is it (the LD)
Another Alternative View
Posted by junkie on 25th of Feb 2010 at 05:13 pm
Steve, Is it (the LD) complete now? I am missing the reference of "diagonal". I am sorry but this is confusing. Without using Elliotese, this looks like a distribution pattern after the uptrend -- through the up-channel -- was completed. Now it should form some sort of a rectangle before breaking in earnest to the downside and retracing the most of its advance, like you said. That would be a retest of the lows at 1044 or a test of of the MA(200). Thank you for your time!
perth, Your detailed and coherent
What a day!
Posted by junkie on 25th of Feb 2010 at 04:46 pm
perth, Your detailed and coherent description speaks well to me. Perfect!
Steve, Could you please draw
Another Alternative View
Posted by junkie on 25th of Feb 2010 at 04:38 pm
Steve, Could you please draw a completed sample pattern for the leading diagonal? I could visualize it for an up-sloping channel, like we had in January on $SPX. With a down sloping channel it's a bit different. I view this leading diagonal as a C down, or {1} of 3 down. I am not sure what another bullish count -- besides C down -- it could fit into. Thanks!
It looks like 1002 is
today's bounce
Posted by junkie on 25th of Feb 2010 at 04:00 pm
It looks like 1002 is still a top -- Matt's chart with a trend line was enlightening -- and you are expecting wave C to go down to 1073ish, if I follow you. What scenario does it fit into? Thanks for your comments!
perth, What's 3-3-5?
today's bounce
Posted by junkie on 25th of Feb 2010 at 03:42 pm
perth, What's 3-3-5?
I learn something from him
Tidbit from Frank Barbera
Posted by junkie on 24th of Feb 2010 at 08:38 pm
I learn something from him each time. Check his postings on www.financialsense.com and see for yourself.
I love your educated guesses.
so far so good #3
Posted by junkie on 24th of Feb 2010 at 02:31 pm
I love your educated guesses. Pure math! Thanks
Title: agreed Agree :). Thanks for
very short term guesses into tomorrow
Posted by junkie on 23rd of Feb 2010 at 05:25 pm
Agree :). Thanks for working out the technical details. To venture my guess, I'd say the obvious that wave 5 will exceed 1150.45 by a small margin, perhaps up to 1170-1180. I am taking CSIQ as a model here, with two tops at 32.50 and 33.61.
Now the most profitable task is to guess how far down the current drop is going to...
Daily versus 60-minute charts. Intermediate-term
SPY EOD 02232010
Posted by junkie on 23rd of Feb 2010 at 04:15 pm
Daily versus 60-minute charts. Intermediate-term versus short-term. Thanks for both, Peridot!
rp, yes I referred to
Posted by junkie on 23rd of Feb 2010 at 03:35 pm
rp, yes I referred to SPY. Given the overbought nature of the market, I don't think it's a one-day pullback either. Thanks for your comments and take care of your family, as this stalemate is likely to last into the close.
rp, thanks and pardon my
Posted by junkie on 23rd of Feb 2010 at 03:08 pm
rp, thanks and pardon my poor phrasing of the question. I was asking about the targets for the entire move down, perhaps into Friday. As far as short-term 110.00 is the "line in the sand", and hopefully we'll close below it. I am joining perth is expecting 1080 minimum on the downside. As far as the bounce, again 110.00 might be the trigger, and we are there now.
rp, I take your target
Posted by junkie on 23rd of Feb 2010 at 02:12 pm
rp, I take your target for XLF is 14.07-08. what's your target for for IYM short (SMN)? Your comments about the hit-and-run market speak well for me.
Splendid, rp! Thanks for posting
Posted by junkie on 23rd of Feb 2010 at 12:44 pm
Splendid, rp! Thanks for posting your trades here!!
Solar energy stocks did too
gold stocks
Posted by junkie on 19th of Feb 2010 at 04:55 pm
Solar energy stocks did too since the opening today. $crx closed up but it may follow the suit.
Expect this uptrend to continue
Short Sale Restrictions Coming?
Posted by junkie on 19th of Feb 2010 at 04:24 pm
Expect this uptrend to continue into Wednesday then!
But there is a $tick
Posted by junkie on 19th of Feb 2010 at 02:27 pm
But there is a $tick divergence on the recent high on 5-minute charts
http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=$TICK&p=15&b=3&g=0&i=p58145293249&a=159157611&r=998
I am not sure if this means that MA(50) is providing any resistance on longer-term charts.
Thanks, rp! I've noticed the
Posted by junkie on 19th of Feb 2010 at 02:17 pm
Thanks, rp! I've noticed the same retest on the GDX 60-minute chart, courtesy of Matt. How does the IYM look to you in that regard? (My target of 32.00 is about to be reached on UYM, if only I re-entered the trade after the 1044 bottom :( )