Are you betting on 1) a trend reversal instead of a trend
continuation, 2) trading for safety instead of trading for a
profit, 3) reversals at obvious places? Those 3 factors would
contribute to losing trades, I've done that myself. If you do only
momentum plays, you should be getting more wins than losses. The
problem with defining a trend is that initially it is seen as the
opposite of it really is (remember the wave {2} of 3 call), and for
a while it's seen as "not sure". When you are sure, it's the trend,
it's pretty close for a reversal.
Corey's daily post today hints on new highs on the $SPX based on
the hidden strength of the acc/distribution indicator now versus
January. Probably at least 30 points up on the $SPX from now, if
similarity to the past streaks of 6-9 up days in a row holds
true.
I too bought SRS this am. Under 7.00 it's a bargain (close to
the last low), and the price touched the lower trend line. The
third touch is usually close to the bottom price, it could make one
more low, but I am going to hold my position for a swing trade.
With market being overbought as it is and the max pain numbers
significantly lower, it's a good risk/reward trade for me.
Now that they have taken out the last known significant
resistance, the game becomes interesting. They could either
reverse right here without making another up Monday -- they
don't have to now! -- or they could make a new high about 4-6%
higher than the January high. Either way, I don't see a reason to
bring this market much higher now, and MA(20) on monthly charts
could serve as a turning point, for example. I would not guess what
they will do, but it's obvious that for them it's "mission
accomplished". FWIW.
Matt, if past two months are any guide, MACD should form a
higher low after stochastics have crossed. Are their any
confirmations or positive divergences of a move above 1130 at that
chart? Purely technically speaking.
Why be a bear? Because there are no buyers at this market (aside
from the PPT), market is rising because short seller are compelled
to cover their shorts and buy, not because there are genuine buyers
at these elevated levels. Any removal of support leaves at least
1.5% drop on the indexes, that happens regularly. I will not sleep
soundly with longs here, be they from set ups or otherwise. I am
staying in cash now, waiting for the last known resistance to be
overcome. Oblivion is blissful but expensive in the long run, risks
are to the downside. Good luck!
It seems that targeting them is precisely the plan of buyers
this week, whoever they are. They are damn close now to milk more
money out of remaining live bears. This is brutal!
Smart people figured out to do exactly that: to use other
markets as clues to ours. $TSX is showing a topping action now,
with possible negative divergence setting on MACD on daily charts,
if the stoch. lines turn down from here. McHugh's idea. Crooks
cannot manipulate all developed markets, they mostly focus on what
makes the biggest effects.
So far it's in its C wave up from an A-B-C correction. I am not
sure that its recovery is not a mere short covering, despite its
impressive looking acc/dist. index.
Do you have any theory for that indifference to the $USD index,
which began in early December? My guess is that the American Fed
(ie., domestic banks) is supporting the market here, and they don't
care about the euro and other currencies. Or, it is the Chinese and
Japanese Central Banks, who don't want to collapse their own
markets, so they will support the US markets for as long as they
can. Their pain threshold should come at 81.5, based on the most
recent dollar action (quick drop from there). FWIW.
Call it the demise of intellectual liberalism, installed by the
same very few. Knowledge is power in this game, I mean factual
knowledge, not generalities. I like your factual observations in
defiance of the purported "facts". Nice call on wave 2 up, by the
way
Peridot or anyone who knows EW: Is there any significance of an
A-B-C up after a 5-wave move down? It strikes me as odd, unless
followed by an A-B-C down, and then a 5-wave move up. I understand
the chart is automatically generated...
jroger, set yourself a system of various stochastics and watch
them for a while, and you'll see the difference. There is no rule
here, Matt uses them as he deems it fit. The difference is how much
delay (or confirmation) you want to give before hopping on a
trend.
The community is delayed by three days for non registered users.
Use other indicators for a
SRS?
Posted by junkie on 5th of Mar 2010 at 04:13 pm
Use other indicators for a swing trade. I posted an RSI signal on the dailies, that's a better entry. You sold exactly where you should have bought.
RSI(14,D)<30 on SRS just triggered.
SRS?
Posted by junkie on 5th of Mar 2010 at 04:08 pm
RSI(14,D)<30 on SRS just triggered. It's a buy signal on daily charts, close to a bottom.
Title: to tilwilson on common
Anybody care to make 95%+ wins?
Posted by junkie on 5th of Mar 2010 at 02:33 pm
Are you betting on 1) a trend reversal instead of a trend continuation, 2) trading for safety instead of trading for a profit, 3) reversals at obvious places? Those 3 factors would contribute to losing trades, I've done that myself. If you do only momentum plays, you should be getting more wins than losses. The problem with defining a trend is that initially it is seen as the opposite of it really is (remember the wave {2} of 3 call), and for a while it's seen as "not sure". When you are sure, it's the trend, it's pretty close for a reversal.
timwilson, How did you program
SRS?
Posted by junkie on 5th of Mar 2010 at 02:22 pm
timwilson, How did you program the trend line on the StrategyDesk? Curious if that could be done.
http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/ Corey's daily post today hints
5 min SPX charts
Posted by junkie on 5th of Mar 2010 at 01:15 pm
http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/
Corey's daily post today hints on new highs on the $SPX based on the hidden strength of the acc/distribution indicator now versus January. Probably at least 30 points up on the $SPX from now, if similarity to the past streaks of 6-9 up days in a row holds true.
I too bought SRS this
there are trader here who buy SRS ?
Posted by junkie on 5th of Mar 2010 at 12:35 pm
I too bought SRS this am. Under 7.00 it's a bargain (close to the last low), and the price touched the lower trend line. The third touch is usually close to the bottom price, it could make one more low, but I am going to hold my position for a swing trade. With market being overbought as it is and the max pain numbers significantly lower, it's a good risk/reward trade for me.
Now that they have taken out the last known significant resistance, the game becomes interesting. They could either reverse right here without making another up Monday -- they don't have to now! -- or they could make a new high about 4-6% higher than the January high. Either way, I don't see a reason to bring this market much higher now, and MA(20) on monthly charts could serve as a turning point, for example. I would not guess what they will do, but it's obvious that for them it's "mission accomplished". FWIW.
Matt, if past two months
Market Comments
Posted by junkie on 4th of Mar 2010 at 06:20 pm
Matt, if past two months are any guide, MACD should form a higher low after stochastics have crossed. Are their any confirmations or positive divergences of a move above 1130 at that chart? Purely technically speaking.
Why be a bear? Because
GS and GOOG ripping ......
Posted by junkie on 4th of Mar 2010 at 05:41 pm
Why be a bear? Because there are no buyers at this market (aside from the PPT), market is rising because short seller are compelled to cover their shorts and buy, not because there are genuine buyers at these elevated levels. Any removal of support leaves at least 1.5% drop on the indexes, that happens regularly. I will not sleep soundly with longs here, be they from set ups or otherwise. I am staying in cash now, waiting for the last known resistance to be overcome. Oblivion is blissful but expensive in the long run, risks are to the downside. Good luck!
It seems that targeting them
GS and GOOG ripping ......
Posted by junkie on 4th of Mar 2010 at 04:21 pm
It seems that targeting them is precisely the plan of buyers this week, whoever they are. They are damn close now to milk more money out of remaining live bears. This is brutal!
Title: FWIW, use $TSX as
I wish our markets were as clean as this....
Posted by junkie on 4th of Mar 2010 at 01:07 pm
Smart people figured out to do exactly that: to use other markets as clues to ours. $TSX is showing a topping action now, with possible negative divergence setting on MACD on daily charts, if the stoch. lines turn down from here. McHugh's idea. Crooks cannot manipulate all developed markets, they mostly focus on what makes the biggest effects.
They are welcome to help
RNN trade idea
Posted by junkie on 4th of Mar 2010 at 12:57 pm
They are welcome to help posted trade ideas to go in our direction.
So far it's in its
national bank of greece
Posted by junkie on 4th of Mar 2010 at 12:36 pm
So far it's in its C wave up from an A-B-C correction. I am not sure that its recovery is not a mere short covering, despite its impressive looking acc/dist. index.
Do you have any theory
US Dollar 240 min
Posted by junkie on 4th of Mar 2010 at 12:14 pm
Do you have any theory for that indifference to the $USD index, which began in early December? My guess is that the American Fed (ie., domestic banks) is supporting the market here, and they don't care about the euro and other currencies. Or, it is the Chinese and Japanese Central Banks, who don't want to collapse their own markets, so they will support the US markets for as long as they can. Their pain threshold should come at 81.5, based on the most recent dollar action (quick drop from there). FWIW.
Title: cwa, nice call on
Market Pattern
Posted by junkie on 4th of Mar 2010 at 11:54 am
Call it the demise of intellectual liberalism, installed by the same very few. Knowledge is power in this game, I mean factual knowledge, not generalities. I like your factual observations in defiance of the purported "facts". Nice call on wave 2 up, by the way
Peridot or anyone who knows
SRS 60 Min. from the GET platform at 11:22 a.m.
Posted by junkie on 4th of Mar 2010 at 11:32 am
Peridot or anyone who knows EW: Is there any significance of an A-B-C up after a 5-wave move down? It strikes me as odd, unless followed by an A-B-C down, and then a 5-wave move up. I understand the chart is automatically generated...
Matt's image charts for the
Stockcharts is not auto-updating
Posted by junkie on 3rd of Mar 2010 at 10:04 am
Matt's image charts for the non-members are.
jroger, set yourself a system
Matt, Just when I settle into the 60 / 89 ...
Posted by junkie on 1st of Mar 2010 at 05:09 pm
jroger, set yourself a system of various stochastics and watch them for a while, and you'll see the difference. There is no rule here, Matt uses them as he deems it fit. The difference is how much delay (or confirmation) you want to give before hopping on a trend.
rp, Do you mean "slope"
Posted by junkie on 1st of Mar 2010 at 03:51 pm
rp, Do you mean "slope" down to confirm? I would guess a gap down tomorrow is in the works.
Matt, how does a system
SPX 5 min and 1 min
Posted by junkie on 1st of Mar 2010 at 02:14 pm
Matt, how does a system for trading futures help in trading market indexes? I am curious.
This could develop into a
XLF and FAZ
Posted by junkie on 26th of Feb 2010 at 04:08 pm
This could develop into a cup with a handle pattern.