FED staff draft proposal on credit card fees, gonna hurt the
bottom line of cc companies big time. not sure the mkt was prepared
for the extent of the hit.
apparently the willingness of creditors holding $16 billion of
questionable mortgage backed securities agreed to continue to
negotiate, and that is viewed as a good sign for the company.
unfortunately for BAC the creditors want to be paid 100 cents on
the dollar for these mortgages priced ~33 cents (I think)
currently. their contention is the mortgages should never have been
pooled in the first place as they didn't meet the criteria of the
pools (not sure if SEC registered or not) they were gathered into.
my understanding is there is another 25+ billion of BAC mortgages
out there with similar problems. bottom line, is eventually
BAC is going to have to take these mortgages back and write off the
difference. by continuing negotiations they won't have to do that
in the fiscal period ending 12/31/10. imho they will have to do it
in 2011, the question will be how much they can 'negotiate' the
damage down. I'd be reluctant to hold BAC as a long term prospect.
JMHO.
mentioned here on friday, held it over the weeknd and gave up
today just before the close. so explain to me how it is up 3 points
after hours. it couldn't have done that Friday???? oh I see, they
put themselves up for sale, and they couldn't have done that
earlier in the day?
marketguy, FOMC only buying under 10 yrs, specifically in the
5-7 year range. thus 10 years on out has few buyers. that is
why the yield curve is so ridiculously steep
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
The community is delayed by three days for non registered users.
TBT
TBT
Posted by hazbin1 on 17th of Dec 2010 at 03:28 pm
just suggesting, POMO was added factor today, due to it's targeted nature in that maturity..
TBT
TBT
Posted by hazbin1 on 17th of Dec 2010 at 03:23 pm
was good setup for reversal today, as POMO had $2 billion targeted in long bonds, and that is a big number for that maturity.
CNBC
Posted by hazbin1 on 17th of Dec 2010 at 02:42 pm
you know its slow when I'm watching (on mute) Cramer pushing NG, on a 5 min bar it rose ~ 20 cents on the highest volume bar of the day 515k shares.
BPOP
BPOP
Posted by hazbin1 on 17th of Dec 2010 at 10:10 am
I made the mistake with this one of looking 'under the hood', sold it out promptl
4 ft snow
Picture of my dog in the snow
Posted by hazbin1 on 17th of Dec 2010 at 09:16 am
nice swap, you get the 2 teenagers and I get the snow
4 ft snow
Picture of my dog in the snow
Posted by hazbin1 on 17th of Dec 2010 at 09:11 am
my kids want to know if you have room for them and their snowboards for vacation week...
SPX
$Indu5, targets
Posted by hazbin1 on 16th of Dec 2010 at 03:50 pm
tgt by tomorrow 1250 imho
V and MA
V and MA
Posted by hazbin1 on 16th of Dec 2010 at 03:02 pm
FED staff draft proposal on credit card fees, gonna hurt the bottom line of cc companies big time. not sure the mkt was prepared for the extent of the hit.
BAC
BAC
Posted by hazbin1 on 16th of Dec 2010 at 09:26 am
apparently the willingness of creditors holding $16 billion of questionable mortgage backed securities agreed to continue to negotiate, and that is viewed as a good sign for the company. unfortunately for BAC the creditors want to be paid 100 cents on the dollar for these mortgages priced ~33 cents (I think) currently. their contention is the mortgages should never have been pooled in the first place as they didn't meet the criteria of the pools (not sure if SEC registered or not) they were gathered into. my understanding is there is another 25+ billion of BAC mortgages out there with similar problems. bottom line, is eventually BAC is going to have to take these mortgages back and write off the difference. by continuing negotiations they won't have to do that in the fiscal period ending 12/31/10. imho they will have to do it in 2011, the question will be how much they can 'negotiate' the damage down. I'd be reluctant to hold BAC as a long term prospect. JMHO.
REDF
REDF
Posted by hazbin1 on 15th of Dec 2010 at 11:39 am
yep, remember that, was looking at the 12/9 post of last week. now at the bottom of the channel, just wondering...
REDF
Posted by hazbin1 on 15th of Dec 2010 at 11:31 am
Matt, hows that bull flag looking these days? noted on 12/9
TZA
TZA charts
Posted by hazbin1 on 14th of Dec 2010 at 03:36 pm
Ditch, I'm with you, had my hand on the trigger today @ 16.29, did it on paper cause my hand hurts from getting smacked so many times past 6 weeks.
REDF
Posted by hazbin1 on 14th of Dec 2010 at 09:49 am
is it still worth an entry at the bottom of the bull flag from 12/9? and what would that level be ~?
GMXR
Posted by hazbin1 on 14th of Dec 2010 at 09:43 am
preferred stock offering
REE
Posted by hazbin1 on 14th of Dec 2010 at 09:25 am
I see it came off the wl yesterday, great timing, they have priced a secondary settlement 12/22. a good reasons for me to find another stock to play.
GXDX
GXDX
Posted by hazbin1 on 13th of Dec 2010 at 06:57 pm
Matt, thanks for the pep talk, guess I gave in too quick
GXDX
Posted by hazbin1 on 13th of Dec 2010 at 04:57 pm
mentioned here on friday, held it over the weeknd and gave up today just before the close. so explain to me how it is up 3 points after hours. it couldn't have done that Friday???? oh I see, they put themselves up for sale, and they couldn't have done that earlier in the day?
URRE
Posted by hazbin1 on 13th of Dec 2010 at 03:28 pm
Matt, per last nite's commodity report, you were looking for another pop, how about backing up to support @ 20 ma? around here?
POMO days
No POMO tomorrow
Posted by hazbin1 on 13th of Dec 2010 at 02:58 pm
I didn't say they were buying them today...
POMO days
No POMO tomorrow
Posted by hazbin1 on 13th of Dec 2010 at 02:51 pm
marketguy, FOMC only buying under 10 yrs, specifically in the 5-7 year range. thus 10 years on out has few buyers. that is why the yield curve is so ridiculously steep