First 3 mins of this 9m:34s video refers to the extreme rarity
of the pattern formed by the last 3 days' price action in the SPX
and the high statistical probability of any gap filling the
following day (albeit based on a extremely small sample size).
Posted by philosoraptor on 18th of Apr 2011 at 02:07 pm
Matt, I believe you have only recently introduced us to the
'MACD BB' indicator. Never seen it before. How does it work
exactly, some sort of combo of the two different indicators?
Posted by philosoraptor on 18th of Apr 2011 at 10:16 am
I looked at your chart again - you seem to have two different
pivot indicators. You have TS's 'Floor Trader Pivots', which I note
is set to the default input of '(5)'. Please manually change it to
'7', which will draw R3 & S3. I think their S3 will match
mine.......?
From MoneyWeek magazine in the UK -
specifically today's MoneyMorning email:
Does Glencore’s
float mark the top of the commodities boom?
Giant commodities trader Glencore has confirmed that it’s planning
to list on the London and Hong Kong stock exchanges.
The Swiss group hopes to sell up to $11bn of shares (most of
it in London). Prices will be announced in the middle of next
month. It’s set to be the biggest initial public offering (IPO) in
the world this year – and the UK market’s biggest ever.
There’s one glaringly obvious question that any contrarian
investor will ask themselves when a big company like this decides
to go public.
Does this mark the top of the market?
When big
companies go public, it’s often a bad sign
History tells us that when big companies go public, it’s often a
bad sign for their markets. Goldman Sachs went public in 1999. The
tech bubble (which produced lots of lovely fees for investment
banks) burst shortly thereafter.
Blackstone Group – the private equity giant – listed in 2007.
The credit bubble (which helped the private equity industry scale
the heights with bigger and bigger deals) had already started to
collapse at that point.
So does the Glencore float mark the top of the commodities
market? Is this the smart money cashing out before the boom ends?
Chief executive Ivan Glasenberg says not. He tells Javier
Blas at the FT: “Nobody is cashing out or taking money off the
table. The idea of the shareholders cashing in and that the IPO of
Glencore is the top of the commodities cycle is totally incorret”.
Of course, he would say that. He can’t turn around and say:
“Well, now you mention it, we thought China was looking a bit
wobbly, and we’ve had a good run at things. What with monetary
policy looking like it might start being tightened around the
world, we thought we’d raise cash from the mug punters while we
still could”.
To be fair, senior partners are locked in for four to five
years. And Glencore has been looking for a way to expand for ages –
there was an abortive merger with Xstrata, for example. The
motivation for listing is to attain the firepower to buy up mining
assets that it couldn’t afford as a private company. So if
anything, Glencore’s float could result in more merger and takeover
mania in the mining sector.
There are plenty
of threats to the commodities boom
However, there are lots of reasons to be wary on commodities
right now. It’s easy to spend too much time focusing on the
developed world, and the inflation vs deflation debate going on
there.
The Bank of England and the Federal Reserve are both saying
that inflation should be ignored. The European Central Bank is the
only major central bank raising interest rates, and that’s as much
to do with defending the euro’s strength as with concerns over
inflation.
But as far as Asia and emerging markets are concerned, the
inflation / deflation debate is over. There’s no question that
inflation is a problem for them. And they’re increasingly trying to
tackle it.
Towards the end of last year, there was a lot of talk of
‘currency wars’, sparked mainly by a catchy soundbite from Brazil’s
finance minister. But it looks as though emerging market countries
have now given up the fight. They’re much happier to let their
currencies rise in an attempt to stave off inflation.
This morning, Singapore said it will allow the Singapore
dollar (one of Tim Price’s favourite currencies, incidentally) to
move higher as economic growth keeps surprising on the upside.
Meanwhile China, which is expected to report inflation above 5% for
March, has allowed the yuan to hit a 17-year high against the
dollar, reports Bloomberg.
China in particular is a worry. If it succeeds in slowing its
economy down, then where is all this demand for commodities going
to come from? Alternatively, the world’s central banks – even in
Asia – may already be too far ‘behind the curve’ to stop inflation
from taking off. But then commodity prices would simply rise until
they become too expensive, destroying demand for them, and sending
prices sharply lower again.
A great deal
hinges on the Federal Reserve
I’m not saying that commodity prices have peaked. And with
the Japanese effectively doing quantitative easing part three,
pumping money into the system in the wake of the earthquake,
perhaps the cheap money in developed worlds will continue to prop
up markets even as emerging countries tighten.
But so many commodity-dependent assets are at near record
highs (just look at the Aussie dollar for example) that it would be
stupid not to at least start being cautious. Particularly when you
have dirty great red flags like Glencore going up. Perhaps the key
– as Dave Kansas noted in the Wall Street Journal earlier this year
– is to watch if the company’s peers, such as US group Cargill,
start to mutter about floating too.
And of course, a great deal hinges on what happens with
quantitative easing in the US later this year. We’ll be looking at
what might happen when (and if) QE2 ends in more detail in a
forthcoming issue of
MoneyWeekmagazine.
Essentially, the report analyses S&P500 Index data all the
way back to 1983 by splitting the trading day into three equal time
periods of 130 minutes and examining which part of the day (if any)
is best for 'Momentum' and 'Mean Reversion' trading. Happily, there
is a very nice inverse correlation of price patterning, which the
chart below demonstrates.
Certainly something to ponder re: chasing vs fading breakouts on
the opening gap, whether to chase late day momentum, etc,
etc.....
Today there is a fairly wide span between S2 and S3. In such
instances, often the pivot 'mid-points' are tested, as per the grey
dotted lines on the SPY chart.
Interesting ZeroHedge article on the CBOE's recent introduction
of the 'SKEW' Index as a better/different indication of fear/tail
risk in the market than the traditional VIX Index...
Steve, your level corresponds with S4. Once again, this extreme
pivot level comes into play. No doubt R4 will be tested on the
bounce in the coming days!
Can get daily charts for free - type in '$BDI' in symbol search
field in top right hand corner of Stockcharts.com home page for
daily chart of Baltic Dry Index...
The community is delayed by three days for non registered users.
Title: Imagine Yes, that price coincides
R3 on the es futures is 1329.50
Posted by philosoraptor on 20th of Apr 2011 at 10:22 am
Yes, that price coincides with the midpoint between R3 and R4.
R4 is very, very rarely breached. Above that is only sky...
SPX: Potential Gap Play
Posted by philosoraptor on 20th of Apr 2011 at 07:21 am
First 3 mins of this 9m:34s video refers to the extreme rarity of the pattern formed by the last 3 days' price action in the SPX and the high statistical probability of any gap filling the following day (albeit based on a extremely small sample size).
http://mtg-dailyvideos.s3.amazonaws.com/041911-741/041911-741.html
[The remainder of the video uses a lot of techincal jargon for in-the-know members of the site, so can be ignored if time is at a premium]
Whatever, do your own DD...
Ha! I presumed it was
YM Dow Futures
Posted by philosoraptor on 18th of Apr 2011 at 02:22 pm
Ha! I presumed it was an M3 / Peter creation, don't worry I will search myself...
Matt, I believe you have
YM Dow Futures
Posted by philosoraptor on 18th of Apr 2011 at 02:07 pm
Matt, I believe you have only recently introduced us to the 'MACD BB' indicator. Never seen it before. How does it work exactly, some sort of combo of the two different indicators?
Title: Different pivot calculation? Matt might
SPY Pivot Points: S4 below?
Posted by philosoraptor on 18th of Apr 2011 at 10:42 am
Matt might be our leader, but don't believe his every word...
On a more serious note, your $SPX 15 min chart earlier showed S3 as $1300.35. My SPY S3 price is $130.02 - close enough for government work?
On the other hand, Matt's SPY S3 shows a price of c. $130.6 - a different calculation methodology?
Matt?
If you open up Matt's
SPY Pivot Points: S4 below?
Posted by philosoraptor on 18th of Apr 2011 at 10:31 am
If you open up Matt's chart, it is SPY too...
I looked at your chart
SPY Pivot Points: S4 below?
Posted by philosoraptor on 18th of Apr 2011 at 10:16 am
I looked at your chart again - you seem to have two different pivot indicators. You have TS's 'Floor Trader Pivots', which I note is set to the default input of '(5)'. Please manually change it to '7', which will draw R3 & S3. I think their S3 will match mine.......?
Interesting! Are your charts set
SPY Pivot Points: S4 below?
Posted by philosoraptor on 18th of Apr 2011 at 10:06 am
Interesting! Are your charts set to regular market hours?
SPY Pivot Points: S4 below?
Posted by philosoraptor on 18th of Apr 2011 at 09:57 am
SPY had an initial bounce off S3 but price looking heavy - if this breaks, look out below for the seldom seen S4.
For the contrarian - commodity top signal?
Posted by philosoraptor on 14th of Apr 2011 at 09:42 am
From MoneyWeek magazine in the UK - specifically today's MoneyMorning email:
Does Glencore’s float mark the top of the commodities boom?
Giant commodities trader Glencore has confirmed that it’s planning to list on the London and Hong Kong stock exchanges.
The Swiss group hopes to sell up to $11bn of shares (most of it in London). Prices will be announced in the middle of next month. It’s set to be the biggest initial public offering (IPO) in the world this year – and the UK market’s biggest ever.
There’s one glaringly obvious question that any contrarian investor will ask themselves when a big company like this decides to go public.
Does this mark the top of the market?
When big companies go public, it’s often a bad sign
History tells us that when big companies go public, it’s often a bad sign for their markets. Goldman Sachs went public in 1999. The tech bubble (which produced lots of lovely fees for investment banks) burst shortly thereafter.
Blackstone Group – the private equity giant – listed in 2007. The credit bubble (which helped the private equity industry scale the heights with bigger and bigger deals) had already started to collapse at that point.
So does the Glencore float mark the top of the commodities market? Is this the smart money cashing out before the boom ends?
Chief executive Ivan Glasenberg says not. He tells Javier Blas at the FT: “Nobody is cashing out or taking money off the table. The idea of the shareholders cashing in and that the IPO of Glencore is the top of the commodities cycle is totally incorret”.
Of course, he would say that. He can’t turn around and say: “Well, now you mention it, we thought China was looking a bit wobbly, and we’ve had a good run at things. What with monetary policy looking like it might start being tightened around the world, we thought we’d raise cash from the mug punters while we still could”.
To be fair, senior partners are locked in for four to five years. And Glencore has been looking for a way to expand for ages – there was an abortive merger with Xstrata, for example. The motivation for listing is to attain the firepower to buy up mining assets that it couldn’t afford as a private company. So if anything, Glencore’s float could result in more merger and takeover mania in the mining sector.
There are plenty of threats to the commodities boom
However, there are lots of reasons to be wary on commodities right now. It’s easy to spend too much time focusing on the developed world, and the inflation vs deflation debate going on there.
The Bank of England and the Federal Reserve are both saying that inflation should be ignored. The European Central Bank is the only major central bank raising interest rates, and that’s as much to do with defending the euro’s strength as with concerns over inflation.
But as far as Asia and emerging markets are concerned, the inflation / deflation debate is over. There’s no question that inflation is a problem for them. And they’re increasingly trying to tackle it.
Towards the end of last year, there was a lot of talk of ‘currency wars’, sparked mainly by a catchy soundbite from Brazil’s finance minister. But it looks as though emerging market countries have now given up the fight. They’re much happier to let their currencies rise in an attempt to stave off inflation.
This morning, Singapore said it will allow the Singapore dollar (one of Tim Price’s favourite currencies, incidentally) to move higher as economic growth keeps surprising on the upside. Meanwhile China, which is expected to report inflation above 5% for March, has allowed the yuan to hit a 17-year high against the dollar, reports Bloomberg.
China in particular is a worry. If it succeeds in slowing its economy down, then where is all this demand for commodities going to come from? Alternatively, the world’s central banks – even in Asia – may already be too far ‘behind the curve’ to stop inflation from taking off. But then commodity prices would simply rise until they become too expensive, destroying demand for them, and sending prices sharply lower again.
A great deal hinges on the Federal Reserve
I’m not saying that commodity prices have peaked. And with the Japanese effectively doing quantitative easing part three, pumping money into the system in the wake of the earthquake, perhaps the cheap money in developed worlds will continue to prop up markets even as emerging countries tighten.
But so many commodity-dependent assets are at near record highs (just look at the Aussie dollar for example) that it would be stupid not to at least start being cautious. Particularly when you have dirty great red flags like Glencore going up. Perhaps the key – as Dave Kansas noted in the Wall Street Journal earlier this year – is to watch if the company’s peers, such as US group Cargill, start to mutter about floating too.
And of course, a great deal hinges on what happens with quantitative easing in the US later this year. We’ll be looking at what might happen when (and if) QE2 ends in more detail in a forthcoming issue of MoneyWeek magazine.
Title: Mid-point support Instead, found support
spx5, came just short of target for descending wedge (purple)...
Posted by philosoraptor on 11th of Apr 2011 at 01:32 pm
Instead, found support at the mid-point between Pivot and S1. For now...
SPY Resistance
SPX Pivot is 1335.34 - currently serving as resistance.
Posted by philosoraptor on 7th of Apr 2011 at 11:29 am
Steve, on my charts the battleground seems to be more S0.5 (mid-point between pivot and S1) and/or the intraday VWAP (cyan/magenta dots).
The intraday VWAP is often retested after a sudden break up or down.
Mapping Intraday Price Movement in the S&P500
Posted by philosoraptor on 6th of Apr 2011 at 06:03 am
Read the TradeStation Labs full report here:
https://www.tradestation.com/support/tslabs/default.aspx?report=21
Essentially, the report analyses S&P500 Index data all the way back to 1983 by splitting the trading day into three equal time periods of 130 minutes and examining which part of the day (if any) is best for 'Momentum' and 'Mean Reversion' trading. Happily, there is a very nice inverse correlation of price patterning, which the chart below demonstrates.
Certainly something to ponder re: chasing vs fading breakouts on the opening gap, whether to chase late day momentum, etc, etc.....
Financials very weak today -
Indu 5 futures, nice bull flag...
Posted by philosoraptor on 21st of Mar 2011 at 12:57 pm
Financials very weak today - you might get your wish in a bit......
Thorium
Posted by philosoraptor on 21st of Mar 2011 at 11:42 am
Matt, interesting article in today's Daily Telegraph re: Thorium:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/8393984/Safe-nuclear-does-exist-and-China-is-leading-the-way-with-thorium.html
The journalist, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, also mentioned it back in August last year:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/7970619/Obama-could-kill-fossil-fuels-overnight-with-a-nuclear-dash-for-thorium.html
Title: Testing mid point level Today
S&P 15 min with levels
Posted by philosoraptor on 1st of Mar 2011 at 01:56 pm
Today there is a fairly wide span between S2 and S3. In such instances, often the pivot 'mid-points' are tested, as per the grey dotted lines on the SPY chart.
New 'SKEW' Index vs Traditional 'VIX'
Posted by philosoraptor on 23rd of Feb 2011 at 07:08 pm
Interesting ZeroHedge article on the CBOE's recent introduction of the 'SKEW' Index as a better/different indication of fear/tail risk in the market than the traditional VIX Index...
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/its-skewed-skewed-world
http://www.cnbc.com/id/41516409/The_Black_Swan_Index_Measuring_the_Probability_of_the_Improbable
Title: SPY testing S4 Steve, your
SPX testing 1324/255 again. The bullish view would be a W-X-Y ...
Posted by philosoraptor on 22nd of Feb 2011 at 12:12 pm
Steve, your level corresponds with S4. Once again, this extreme pivot level comes into play. No doubt R4 will be tested on the bounce in the coming days!
Title: Baltic Dry Index Can get
Baltic Dry INdex??
Posted by philosoraptor on 4th of Feb 2011 at 05:11 pm
Can get daily charts for free - type in '$BDI' in symbol search field in top right hand corner of Stockcharts.com home page for daily chart of Baltic Dry Index...
Title: SPY bounced off S4 R4
SPX 5 Minute
Posted by philosoraptor on 28th of Jan 2011 at 01:00 pm
R4 and S4 are in play in this wacky market, should be added to pivots indicator. They are rarely breached, but it does happen...