no no no no, god it's so annoying that TS does makes that so
confusing, I called TS so many times to complain about this, that
is NOT the annual % gain.
Look at the dollar amount for the yearly gains - so let's take
example of XLE, here's the yearly gains, each trade is set to
$10,000, that means that in 2014 the system made $2353 on $10K, or
23.5%. The dollar amount is the same as percentage because
each trade is set to $10K with no compounding, I do that so that
percentages are easy to compute.
This XLE sysetm here averages about $2600 out of $10,000 per
trade or 26%
the % gain column that you see next to the Net Profit is not
yearly %, it's based on a cumulative total of the combined, which
is not annual % as you think of.
well - it's not that, I think they over complicated it by making
the % return some weird % cumulative return total thing, they
should have just made it straight % return
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
no no no no, god
XLE Weekly ETF sysetms
Posted by matt on 3rd of Mar 2015 at 01:01 pm
no no no no, god it's so annoying that TS does makes that so confusing, I called TS so many times to complain about this, that is NOT the annual % gain.
Look at the dollar amount for the yearly gains - so let's take example of XLE, here's the yearly gains, each trade is set to $10,000, that means that in 2014 the system made $2353 on $10K, or 23.5%. The dollar amount is the same as percentage because each trade is set to $10K with no compounding, I do that so that percentages are easy to compute.
This XLE sysetm here averages about $2600 out of $10,000 per trade or 26%
the % gain column that you see next to the Net Profit is not yearly %, it's based on a cumulative total of the combined, which is not annual % as you think of.
PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO CLICK HERE
ETF System
Posted by clearstream on 3rd of Mar 2015 at 02:45 pm
Ok thanks Matt. Yes you'd think a company like TS would clearly get "Annual return"
well - it's not that,
Posted by matt on 4th of Mar 2015 at 01:16 am
well - it's not that, I think they over complicated it by making the % return some weird % cumulative return total thing, they should have just made it straight % return