Kinda makes the impositions by EPA upon US appear pointless. Yet
we pay more for what we need and have less jobs as a result. If 1
Billion+ do not share our concern for environment, then we can be
pristine eco-nature lovers and it will still make no
difference.
Solar stocks blocked by the smog! Those
two posts go together. Nice Steve [Thumbs-Up]
Posted by pimacanyon on 6th of Dec 2013 at 01:31 pm
Are you serious? We can go outside most days in our
largest cities and breathe relatively clean air. You'd do
away with the EPA and smog controls on cars and trucks, so we could
enjoy breathing air like the Chinese do in Shanghai?
According to CEI, the biggest cost tucked into this year's
agenda comes from environmental regulations, adding up to roughly
$379 billion.
Got money and a job? Then this cost you nothing; others suffer.
Compassion is scarce.
Also, the article (nor I) does not recommend the abolition of
EPA. Put it on a leash.
I will not put words in your mouth, so long as you observe the
same common decency. Thanks in advance.
The marginal cost of incremental benefit is always paid in some
opportunity cost in other efforts not made, resources or
productivity, and yes, even jobs lost.
Posted by pimacanyon on 6th of Dec 2013 at 02:16 pm
Sorry, I did not intend to put words in your mouth, was just
asking a question. But because this is not trading related, I
sent you a PM if you want to discuss further. Good weekend to
you.
Shanghai pollution
Posted by steve on 6th of Dec 2013 at 11:48 am
http://screencast.com/t/hWVfP669a
Kinda makes the impositions by
Posted by cubby on 6th of Dec 2013 at 12:00 pm
Kinda makes the impositions by EPA upon US appear pointless. Yet we pay more for what we need and have less jobs as a result. If 1 Billion+ do not share our concern for environment, then we can be pristine eco-nature lovers and it will still make no difference.
Solar stocks blocked by the smog! Those
two posts go together. Nice Steve [Thumbs-Up]
shanghai and EPA
Posted by pimacanyon on 6th of Dec 2013 at 01:31 pm
Are you serious? We can go outside most days in our largest cities and breathe relatively clean air. You'd do away with the EPA and smog controls on cars and trucks, so we could enjoy breathing air like the Chinese do in Shanghai?
Not a joke, jobs lost.
Posted by cubby on 6th of Dec 2013 at 01:39 pm
Not a joke, jobs lost. Read for yourself. 'HIDDEN TAX': Red tape tab nears $2T
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/12/06/regulation-nation-govt-regs-estimated-to-cost-18t/
According to CEI, the biggest cost tucked into this year's agenda comes from environmental regulations, adding up to roughly $379 billion.
Got money and a job? Then this cost you nothing; others suffer. Compassion is scarce.
Also, the article (nor I) does not recommend the abolition of EPA. Put it on a leash.
I will not put words in your mouth, so long as you observe the same common decency. Thanks in advance.
The marginal cost of incremental benefit is always paid in some opportunity cost in other efforts not made, resources or productivity, and yes, even jobs lost.
shanghai pollution
Posted by pimacanyon on 6th of Dec 2013 at 02:16 pm
Sorry, I did not intend to put words in your mouth, was just asking a question. But because this is not trading related, I sent you a PM if you want to discuss further. Good weekend to you.
Agree. Better offline
Posted by cubby on 6th of Dec 2013 at 02:24 pm
Agree. Better offline