These are two relevant posts by Cory Rosenbloom of Afraid to
Trade
The second one about failed sell signals makes me think
that the reversal will come on an "obvious" bull trade set up where
everyone buys into it, but the bottom drops out instead. Just the
opposite of what happened when everyone was talking about the head
and shoulder top a while ago.
The email you just received titled "My Predictions" was sent out
without my approval. It was not my intention to say I told you so -
that is not my style. Had I seen this email in advance it would not
have been worded in the manner that it was.
I have always believed that my presentation in 2006 in front of the
Western Regional Mortgage Bankers Association proves conclusively
what Washington, Wall Street, and the main stream media do not want
the public to know -- that the financial crisis was easily
predictable by anyone with a solid understanding of
economics.
When I originally posted this presentation to YouTube it was split
into eight clips, and not nearly as many people viewed it as I had
hoped. Now that I am a YouTube partner I was able to upload the
entire presentation into one clip. If you have not had the
opportunity to watch it, and you have an hour and fifteen minutes
to spare, I think you will find it well worth your time. If you
consider when this presentation was made, and the audience I was
addressing, it is even more compelling.
I hope that despite its length, this video can widely circulate on
the internet. To help achieve this goal, try to forward it to as
many people as you can. Hopefully a number of the people who
ultimately view it will reside in Connecticut, helping voters
conclude that having a senator who warned about the crisis in
advance is preferable to having one who played an integral role in
creating it.
Best Regards,
Peter Schiff
President and Chief Global Strategist
Euro Pacific Capital
Agree with you. I think, in general, that most of us on the blog
have been overly bearish, and are frozen in time, waiting for
a pull-back that so far has not happened. This has influenced our
bias and trading style. I believe the best way to deal with trading
is to try to be risk neutral, not risk seeking where you blow out
your cash, or risk averse where you can't get into a trade, or if
you do, you exit way too soon. The market keeps going
up, leaving most of us behind. If and when the
retracement arrives, it may not even get back to where we are today
before it starts to go up again. As for comparisons to other times
for analogies, I think this is not your grandaddies bear
market!
Also, I keep seeing people talking about the Trend. We are
definitley in a trend! I think some of the concepts for trend
days can be extrapolated to larger trends- namely that you can
throw oscillators out the window, and that one of the
primary tools to use should be moving averages. Using a
9-39 ema for the
$spx would have essentially had you in the
entire uptrend since July 13th. This also seems to have a
similar effect on the Mechanical systems, which
appartenlty don't do too well in a trending market, as
there is insufficient volatility.
Could you (in one of your updates, or elsewhere) explain
the significance of declining volume in a flag, why you look for
it, and how it transforms into another leg up? Also, is the next
large volume spike the trigger to get in, or is that too late, and
how do you set the entry level?
Agree Finviz is a useful free resource. To anyone interested in
using Finviz, here is a short
videothat give a brief introduction to it by
Brian Shannon of Alphatrends.
This chart shows how the ATR (Average True Range ) correlates
with the lows on the SPX as well as the minima in the MACD, and the
buy signals on the slow stoch 60,3. There are also volume spikes
most of the time we see a maximum on the ATR. Looks like we
are still not seeing the ATR climb, as it seems to still be
trending lower- implying continued strength in the SPX?? Maybe we
will see this climb shortly.
Hope this chart appears. Always seem to have trouble posting
pngs.
For all the talk about “green shoots” in the financial media
these days, one might mistake CNBC for HGTV. However, what many see
as the first promising sprouts of economic recovery are, in
reality, the artificially generated, short-term gains from the most
massive dose of fertilizer (government stimulus) that the country
has ever seen. Few talking heads on Wall Street or in Washington
understand the damage that such a flood of chemicals will inflict
on the long-term health of our economic soil.
The “green shoot” discussion centers on the less-than-horrific
data that began to emerge a few months after the economic free fall
of Q4:08. The statistics regarding unemployment, business spending,
consumer confidence, and credit availability have all recovered
somewhat. Many of these numbers are labeled “positive” merely
because they're not declining as rapidly as they had before. In
response to these perceived stirrings of health, the U.S .stock
market has put in a strong rally.
But now, as the statistical trends are appearing to falter, many
are questioning the significance of these “green shoots.” Since one
of the greenest of shoots happens to be rising stock prices, a
minor reversal in the current rally in itself could cause the rest
of the garden to wilt in concert.
The observation that no one seems to be making is that the
modest statistical improvement comes as a result of trillions of
dollars of government stimulus spending. It would be impossible for
such a program to not have such an effect. But artificial
government stimuli are no more capable of creating lasting economic
growth than green paint is capable of making a healthy lawn.
The question Euro Pacific investors should now be asking is
whether our foreign stocks, many of which have rallied strongly off
their 2008 lows, will decline when the rally in U.S. stocks
reverses. Many of you may be tempted to lighten up on your
positions now and look to reposition later at lower prices. As
always, my preference is to stay the course.
First, the “green shoots” may take awhile to wither, i.e. recent
stock market strength may continue for many more months. Even if
another meaningful decline is already under way, my gut feeling is
that foreign stocks will not fall as much as domestic stocks. In
2008, the decline in foreign stocks was far steeper than domestic
stocks. Most investors now assume that this dynamic will repeat,
should the downturn resume. I do not concur. I believe that the
panic has already occurred, and the fever it sparked has passed.
Going forward, fundamentals will be a bigger driver of stock price;
and overseas, the fundamentals are still better.
More importantly, I do not expect another big rally in the
dollar to accompany a selloff in stocks. That was last year's head
fake, and I do not think investors will fall for it a second time.
More likely, I think the dollar will fall in conjunction with
stocks, particularly if accompanied by confirmation that the U.S
recession is worsening. In fact, this time it might be dollar
weakness that actually precipitates a decline in stocks, which will
mitigate any share price declines for U.S. holders of non-dollar
stocks.
Also, given how quickly stocks can turn around, as evidenced by
the strength of the March to May rally, short-term market timing is
a difficult game to win. My feeling is that the long-term risks of
mistiming the markets outweigh the short-term risks of holding
through a correction. In other words: we should concentrate on
winning the war, not every battle. For that reason, I will be much
more interested in buying into any weakness in foreign stocks and
selling into any dollar strength, rather than looking to guard
against those potential outcomes.
Far and away, investors' biggest concern should be the
likelihood of further deterioration in the U.S. economy, and the
probability of a sharp decline in the value of the dollar. Also, I
believe foreign economies will not be affected in the way many now
believe. As I have said many times before, a sharp decline in the
value of the dollar and a significant reduction of foreign
purchases of U.S. treasuries will spur, not inhibit, global growth.
So while the waters may remain choppy for some time, the current is
definitely still drifting in our direction.
The community is delayed by three days for non registered users.
Hayek Versus Keynes: A Hip Hop Battle
Posted by x100 on 27th of Jan 2010 at 09:07 pm
http://www.businessinsider.com/hayek-versus-keynes-a-hip-hop-battle-2010-1
volume spike
Here is a chart of the volume spike I mentioned.
Posted by x100 on 15th of Jan 2010 at 12:23 am
this is from larry levin's Secrets of traders web site
2:03 p.m. EST
What happened at 12:03pm Eastern Time? There were no reports out, the 10-YR
Note auction wasn’t until 12pm, and the S&P500 was a bit stonewalled just
under 1137.00 after a rally from the day’s low. As the market advanced
slowly through the congestion it hit: a MASSIVE order, or series of orders,
lifted the offer in the e-minis. But it wasn’t your garden variety large
order of 2,000 mini’s - I’m talking about 114 times that size.
At 11:03am today at the Chicago Board of Trade (12:03pm EST) over a quarter
of a million mini-S&P500 orders traded north of 1137.00! (228,000 last
count)
I looked at the attached chart in disbelief. (Please see attached chart for
more info.)
Could this be real I wondered? Was it some sort of computer malfunction
that added too many zeros to the reported, yet smaller, trades?
No, that’s not what happened. In fact, a bit of a hullabaloo occurred
around my trading booth on the floor of the CBOT as many locals, brokers,
and compliance members stared at the aforementioned volume chart in
disbelief. As it turns out, all of the trades were indeed valid. None were
busted. Moreover, as one of the compliance members told me, he saw the
trades listed sequentially (1,000 or 2,000 lot orders) and they all occurred
with milliseconds of one another until the massive order was completed.
This order size takes a SERIOUS bankroll to get done. If you are wrong by
one-point on a 228,000 lot ES order, you can say goodbye to $11,400,000.00.
If you contemplate this size your margin requirement is $1,282,500,000.00,
while the notional value is $12,961,800,000.00.
Has a new “playha” hit the scene? Is his nickname “Helicopter?” Has high
frequency trading (HFT) taken root in the mini-S&P in a huge way?
In the end it may turn out to have been a “cross trade,” where one
institutional firm prearranges a large order with another to clear it in an
orderly fashion.
As of now I don’t have a firm answer, but whether it was HFT activity, the
“Helicopter,” or a massive cross trade, it sure set the bottom in for the
afternoon. Everyone in the Dow, Nasdaq, and S&P pits were talking about it
and nobody was willing to sell into that massive bid.
home sales
Umphhh!!
Posted by x100 on 5th of Jan 2010 at 10:50 am
Bad numbers mean interest rates stay low. Which means..................... go long!
Title: Site for Daily candle
Posted by x100 on 24th of Oct 2009 at 10:53 pm
http://www.americanbulls.com/Default.asp
http://www.candlesticker.com/
Title: Afraid to trade blog These
Posted by x100 on 15th of Oct 2009 at 11:03 pm
These are two relevant posts by Cory Rosenbloom of Afraid to Trade
The second one about failed sell signals makes me think that the reversal will come on an "obvious" bull trade set up where everyone buys into it, but the bottom drops out instead. Just the opposite of what happened when everyone was talking about the head and shoulder top a while ago.
USO Bear Trap and Breakout as of October 15
failed sell signals
Peter Schiff Video
Posted by x100 on 25th of Sep 2009 at 09:23 pm
Dear Investor,
The email you just received titled "My Predictions" was sent out without my approval. It was not my intention to say I told you so - that is not my style. Had I seen this email in advance it would not have been worded in the manner that it was.
I have always believed that my presentation in 2006 in front of the Western Regional Mortgage Bankers Association proves conclusively what Washington, Wall Street, and the main stream media do not want the public to know -- that the financial crisis was easily predictable by anyone with a solid understanding of economics.
When I originally posted this presentation to YouTube it was split into eight clips, and not nearly as many people viewed it as I had hoped. Now that I am a YouTube partner I was able to upload the entire presentation into one clip. If you have not had the opportunity to watch it, and you have an hour and fifteen minutes to spare, I think you will find it well worth your time. If you consider when this presentation was made, and the audience I was addressing, it is even more compelling.
Click hereto view the video.
I hope that despite its length, this video can widely circulate on the internet. To help achieve this goal, try to forward it to as many people as you can. Hopefully a number of the people who ultimately view it will reside in Connecticut, helping voters conclude that having a senator who warned about the crisis in advance is preferable to having one who played an integral role in creating it.
Best Regards,
Peter Schiff
President and Chief Global Strategist
Euro Pacific Capital
pessimistic
July Trading (Review of My trading) Issue
Posted by x100 on 4th of Aug 2009 at 01:30 pm
Agree with you. I think, in general, that most of us on the blog have been overly bearish, and are frozen in time, waiting for a pull-back that so far has not happened. This has influenced our bias and trading style. I believe the best way to deal with trading is to try to be risk neutral, not risk seeking where you blow out your cash, or risk averse where you can't get into a trade, or if you do, you exit way too soon. The market keeps going up, leaving most of us behind. If and when the retracement arrives, it may not even get back to where we are today before it starts to go up again. As for comparisons to other times for analogies, I think this is not your grandaddies bear market!
Also, I keep seeing people talking about the Trend. We are definitley in a trend! I think some of the concepts for trend days can be extrapolated to larger trends- namely that you can throw oscillators out the window, and that one of the primary tools to use should be moving averages. Using a 9-39 ema for the $spx would have essentially had you in the entire uptrend since July 13th. This also seems to have a similar effect on the Mechanical systems, which appartenlty don't do too well in a trending market, as there is insufficient volatility.
Ha! Don't know how it
$NYA50R stocks above their 50 day MA
Posted by x100 on 4th of Aug 2009 at 09:27 am
Ha! Don't know how it can stay in that nose-bleed area for much longer.
$NYA50R stocks above their 50 day MA
Posted by x100 on 4th of Aug 2009 at 02:16 am
Thought it would timely to repost a variation of this chartshowing percent of stocks above their 50 day MA.
Declining volume as it relates to flags or pennants
Posted by x100 on 29th of Jul 2009 at 01:56 pm
Matt,
Could you (in one of your updates, or elsewhere) explain the significance of declining volume in a flag, why you look for it, and how it transforms into another leg up? Also, is the next large volume spike the trigger to get in, or is that too late, and how do you set the entry level?
Thanks
finviz
ANeat website with a good stock scanner
Posted by x100 on 28th of Jul 2009 at 11:50 pm
Agree Finviz is a useful free resource. To anyone interested in using Finviz, here is a short videothat give a brief introduction to it by Brian Shannon of Alphatrends.
SPX
Posted by x100 on 22nd of Jul 2009 at 11:17 pm
This chart shows how the ATR (Average True Range ) correlates with the lows on the SPX as well as the minima in the MACD, and the buy signals on the slow stoch 60,3. There are also volume spikes most of the time we see a maximum on the ATR. Looks like we are still not seeing the ATR climb, as it seems to still be trending lower- implying continued strength in the SPX?? Maybe we will see this climb shortly.
Hope this chart appears. Always seem to have trouble posting pngs.
Yeah, thought about that. The
TSX
Posted by x100 on 15th of Jul 2009 at 11:29 pm
Yeah, thought about that. The 5 steps seemed to fit nicely so went with it. Will see how it all plays.
TSX
Posted by x100 on 15th of Jul 2009 at 11:03 pm
Hourly Oil Futures trend
Posted by x100 on 10th of Jul 2009 at 11:43 pm
60 Minute Oil futures trendfor the last 10 days since the high of $73.38 on June 29th
TSX 60 min
TSX Trade Set Up
Posted by x100 on 1st of Jul 2009 at 01:47 am
kingpin -intersting chart. Thanks for posting. I have it a bit different, but am glad to see your variation. See my chart attached.
By the way am trying to get a better way to post .png charts, so not sure if mine will show up. If not will post it later as it is late now.
Schiff-Green Shoots Turning Brown?
Posted by x100 on 30th of Jun 2009 at 11:06 pm
June 30_09
For all the talk about “green shoots” in the financial media these days, one might mistake CNBC for HGTV. However, what many see as the first promising sprouts of economic recovery are, in reality, the artificially generated, short-term gains from the most massive dose of fertilizer (government stimulus) that the country has ever seen. Few talking heads on Wall Street or in Washington understand the damage that such a flood of chemicals will inflict on the long-term health of our economic soil.
The “green shoot” discussion centers on the less-than-horrific data that began to emerge a few months after the economic free fall of Q4:08. The statistics regarding unemployment, business spending, consumer confidence, and credit availability have all recovered somewhat. Many of these numbers are labeled “positive” merely because they're not declining as rapidly as they had before. In response to these perceived stirrings of health, the U.S .stock market has put in a strong rally.
But now, as the statistical trends are appearing to falter, many are questioning the significance of these “green shoots.” Since one of the greenest of shoots happens to be rising stock prices, a minor reversal in the current rally in itself could cause the rest of the garden to wilt in concert.
The observation that no one seems to be making is that the modest statistical improvement comes as a result of trillions of dollars of government stimulus spending. It would be impossible for such a program to not have such an effect. But artificial government stimuli are no more capable of creating lasting economic growth than green paint is capable of making a healthy lawn.
The question Euro Pacific investors should now be asking is whether our foreign stocks, many of which have rallied strongly off their 2008 lows, will decline when the rally in U.S. stocks reverses. Many of you may be tempted to lighten up on your positions now and look to reposition later at lower prices. As always, my preference is to stay the course.
First, the “green shoots” may take awhile to wither, i.e. recent stock market strength may continue for many more months. Even if another meaningful decline is already under way, my gut feeling is that foreign stocks will not fall as much as domestic stocks. In 2008, the decline in foreign stocks was far steeper than domestic stocks. Most investors now assume that this dynamic will repeat, should the downturn resume. I do not concur. I believe that the panic has already occurred, and the fever it sparked has passed. Going forward, fundamentals will be a bigger driver of stock price; and overseas, the fundamentals are still better.
More importantly, I do not expect another big rally in the dollar to accompany a selloff in stocks. That was last year's head fake, and I do not think investors will fall for it a second time. More likely, I think the dollar will fall in conjunction with stocks, particularly if accompanied by confirmation that the U.S recession is worsening. In fact, this time it might be dollar weakness that actually precipitates a decline in stocks, which will mitigate any share price declines for U.S. holders of non-dollar stocks.
Also, given how quickly stocks can turn around, as evidenced by the strength of the March to May rally, short-term market timing is a difficult game to win. My feeling is that the long-term risks of mistiming the markets outweigh the short-term risks of holding through a correction. In other words: we should concentrate on winning the war, not every battle. For that reason, I will be much more interested in buying into any weakness in foreign stocks and selling into any dollar strength, rather than looking to guard against those potential outcomes.
Far and away, investors' biggest concern should be the likelihood of further deterioration in the U.S. economy, and the probability of a sharp decline in the value of the dollar. Also, I believe foreign economies will not be affected in the way many now believe. As I have said many times before, a sharp decline in the value of the dollar and a significant reduction of foreign purchases of U.S. treasuries will spur, not inhibit, global growth. So while the waters may remain choppy for some time, the current is definitely still drifting in our direction.
Larry Levin calls it as he sees it
Posted by x100 on 30th of Jun 2009 at 06:10 pm
Don,
I had no idea my CNBC appearance yesterday would become such an internet sensation.
Apparently that's what you get when you speak the truth on CNBC.
Or could it be that Rick Santelli and I finally agreed on something and went up against Steve LIESman!?
Whatever it is that caused all the buzz, you'll have to see it to believe it.
Click Below to watch Larry Levin's latest CNBC appearance...
Click Here to Watch Larry on CNBC
Best trades to you (my help will get you there),
Larry Levin
888.755.3846
312.235.2572
larry@secretsoftraders.com
Senior Open
US Senior Open
Posted by x100 on 30th of Jun 2009 at 10:28 am
Impressive. If you open a blog on Golf, I am in. Teach me how not to shank or Chili dip those 40 yard wedges. lol
Some Toronto Golds
Posted by x100 on 25th of Jun 2009 at 10:50 am
GDX and a few TO Golds