ayazar- the MA's did NOT cross yesterday for SRS, it needed the
morning gap up to cause the MA's to cross, which makes them appear
that they crossed yesterday, but they did not. Make a chart
of SRS that ends yesterday and you will see that the MA's did not
cross.
here's a chart of SRS from yesterday and how SRS appeared on
Tuesday's close, as you can see the MA's
DID NOT
cross! again it needed the gap up on Wed to cause them
to cross.
Thank you for explanation. I think you are right. It
was a bit tricky for me but that thing made me to stay aside and
standstill. Since several days I was waiting for SRS to
cross. I feel so bad now I missed profit.
no I understand, it's a tricky thing, I was confused many months
ago when I first saw that. However the good thing is that now
you know and therefore no confusion in the future
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
ayazar - the MA's did NOT
Mechanical System Results
Posted by matt on 14th of May 2009 at 01:30 am
ayazar - the MA's did NOT cross yesterday for SRS, it needed the morning gap up to cause the MA's to cross, which makes them appear that they crossed yesterday, but they did not. Make a chart of SRS that ends yesterday and you will see that the MA's did not cross.
here's a chart of SRS from yesterday and how SRS appeared on Tuesday's close, as you can see the MA's DID NOT cross! again it needed the gap up on Wed to cause them to cross.
SRS 15 min chart from yesterday.png
SRS cross
Posted by ayazar on 14th of May 2009 at 01:47 am
Thank you for explanation. I think you are right. It was a bit tricky for me but that thing made me to stay aside and standstill. Since several days I was waiting for SRS to cross. I feel so bad now I missed profit.
When in doubt read the
Posted by bkout3 on 14th of May 2009 at 09:13 am
When in doubt read the values from the averages in your data box -- remember it only "counts" when the candle has closed.
Using SD you could also create an indicator that would change color depending on the relative positions of the MAs.
no I understand, it's a
Posted by matt on 14th of May 2009 at 01:50 am
no I understand, it's a tricky thing, I was confused many months ago when I first saw that. However the good thing is that now you know and therefore no confusion in the future