There's no action that could stimulate the "recovery" that
everyone is seeking, and it's pointless - cathartic perhaps, but
pointless - to point the finger at any one or any party. I
agree that the best course of action would be to let it burn; stop
trying to triage the dead. It would be the economic
equivalent of the Forest Service's 'let it burn' policy. But,
like the FS policy, the biggest obstacle to implementing that
policy is the public's strong distaste for "inaction' in the face
of a crisis, even if it's the right course of action.
If anyone - Obama, Bush, Buffett... - said "my plan is let the
weak fail and invest in whomever's left standing", there would be
equally strong criticism of that tactic. I see a lot of
people complaining, and read/hear a lot of platitudes, but no one
with any real substance behind their alternatives.
There's no action that could
Posted by rjdst on 4th of Mar 2009 at 09:29 am
There's no action that could stimulate the "recovery" that everyone is seeking, and it's pointless - cathartic perhaps, but pointless - to point the finger at any one or any party. I agree that the best course of action would be to let it burn; stop trying to triage the dead. It would be the economic equivalent of the Forest Service's 'let it burn' policy. But, like the FS policy, the biggest obstacle to implementing that policy is the public's strong distaste for "inaction' in the face of a crisis, even if it's the right course of action.
If anyone - Obama, Bush, Buffett... - said "my plan is let the weak fail and invest in whomever's left standing", there would be equally strong criticism of that tactic. I see a lot of people complaining, and read/hear a lot of platitudes, but no one with any real substance behind their alternatives.
no now we SAVE the weakest
Posted by delane on 4th of Mar 2009 at 09:44 am
and hope we have trickle up economics.