Thanks, Morgan. As you say,

    Why the obsession with AAPL??

    Posted by RichieD on 17th of Nov 2012 at 10:36 am

    to each his own.  

    Just keep in mind that instruments of leverage are a double edged sword.  When you put up $5,000, as you say, through one of these instruments, you are in fact risking more than when I put up $5,000 to buy shares in a stock.  Here's why: We always have to keep in mind we could be wrong and we may lose the trade.  So, if I put up $5,000 on a stock and the position moves against me by 1.5%, I lose $75.00; but if you're wrong by 1.5%, you LOSE $1,000.  In effect, you are putting more at risk than I am (risking $1,000 to make $1,000).  

    Your play offers greater leverage than mine, which is great if your right (and yes, you do need to be right more often than I do).  My approach is different.  Having been a professional horseplayer, I see value in risking little to make a lot.  Stops help me do that since my downside is limited while my upside is open-ended.   

    Anyway, best of luck trading whatever you're most comfortable with.

    all agreed richie

    Posted by morgan8 on 17th of Nov 2012 at 11:52 am

    answer is i will risk $200 to make $1000 but not 1:1,  and will not risk 2.0% of account on a trade.

    so how does the switch from horses to stocks work for you, is there some crossover?

Newsletter

Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!