I'm not against shorting but........

    Posted by RichieD on 3rd of Oct 2011 at 01:59 pm

    there ought to be a mechanism whereby anyone who owns shares of a company is allowed to "opt not to make those shares available to those who want to borrow them".  After all, in theory such shares are the property of the owner.  One either owns a stock or sells it.

    If such a mechanism were in place, logic says there would be no shares to borrow.  After all, why would anyone who owned of shares of a company (someone who presumably wants to see the price go higher) allow their shares to be loaned out "for the express purpose of shorting that company and trying to drive the value of the stock lower"??  That would go against their interest.  Instead, owners would want to make "loanable" shares scarce.  No owner would loan their shares out...institutions holding the "stock" on behalf of the owner would be precluded from loaning out those shares...and as a result, no shares would be available to short.

    That's what a "free market" should be about!! 

    There is an opt out for loaning shares

    Posted by perthx on 3rd of Oct 2011 at 02:26 pm

    It is called a Cash account...they can never loan out your shares in a cash account....that is why they always want you to sign the margin agreements, even if you never use it, they will.

    You can always cross out the 'hypothecation' clause

    Posted by lessarda on 3rd of Oct 2011 at 02:03 pm

    in your brokerage agreement. Whether the broker will accept and comply is another question.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!