I don't mind it and I don't mind doing a table but I also think if that was posted and nothing else there would have been questions.  The problem is now that everyone understands, or seems to understand, they look at a template and say "oh yes I would understand that" but my fear is they are not properly looking at it from a standpoint of having no knowledge. 

Frankly, this is not rocket science.  In fact its not even putting the square peg in the square hole.  I think wording wise it could have been better and I think if Matt's "Clarification" post was what was sent then there wouldn't have been as much of an issue but the way it worked was the sell was first called out by the system and then the buy and then the buy was not really confirmed until roughly 20 min before the close and caused somewhat of a rush.  Opining over the proper wording and being timely were battling.  We can improve.

I like the layout and the idea cause it mixes concrete situations with comments to help add flexibility.  There are other issues that the formatting also needs to be able to be emailed cause we send right from the webpage so there are other concerns that come into play when you have all these products that link (email, SMS, website etc.).  What I appreciate is your feedback and your willingness to not just criticize but help provide a solution.  That means a lot.