so your conclusion Michael is that we should only post on the
blog if we agree with something? Be interesting to hear if anyone
else agrees with this stance. I would have thought fellow traders
would like to know what works and what doesn't. What the heck is
the point in a blog if research and experiences are not shared? You
are heavily outnumbered here given the feedback from other posters
on the value (or otherwise) of EW.
I value not only people saying hey that worked great but equally
outlining things that don't work.
vimal -- that's not what I said. You were speaking of
"bashing" -- your word not mine. I'm all for reasoned
discourse. People repeatedly mocking EW or saying it sucks is
not sharing research and experiences. And its that mindless
bashing that upsets people and starts off negative
threads. Anyway -- this is the end of it for
me.
bashing...Matts word originally not mine. In any area in life
whether it be work, sport, social, family or other, sharing
experiences good and bad helps nurture and develop oneself. I share
experiences with my children every day both good and bad. If I only
share good experiences with them, then they will not know the good
from the bad and what to avoid as they develop. I would rather they
learn from my bad experiences or emperical research I have (eg
don't eat too many sweets because it messes up your teeth and you
will end up getting diabetes) rather than them find out after the
event and have only a rear view mirror to look at
Maybe this will explain better the value in providing
information both good and bad on not just this forum but in any
walk of life
Title: summary so your conclusion Michael
OK guys
Posted by vimal on 31st of Mar 2011 at 09:26 am
so your conclusion Michael is that we should only post on the blog if we agree with something? Be interesting to hear if anyone else agrees with this stance. I would have thought fellow traders would like to know what works and what doesn't. What the heck is the point in a blog if research and experiences are not shared? You are heavily outnumbered here given the feedback from other posters on the value (or otherwise) of EW.
I value not only people saying hey that worked great but equally outlining things that don't work.
vimal -- that's not what
Posted by Michael on 31st of Mar 2011 at 09:30 am
vimal -- that's not what I said. You were speaking of "bashing" -- your word not mine. I'm all for reasoned discourse. People repeatedly mocking EW or saying it sucks is not sharing research and experiences. And its that mindless bashing that upsets people and starts off negative threads. Anyway -- this is the end of it for me.
bashing...Matts word originally not mine.
Posted by vimal on 31st of Mar 2011 at 10:44 am
bashing...Matts word originally not mine. In any area in life whether it be work, sport, social, family or other, sharing experiences good and bad helps nurture and develop oneself. I share experiences with my children every day both good and bad. If I only share good experiences with them, then they will not know the good from the bad and what to avoid as they develop. I would rather they learn from my bad experiences or emperical research I have (eg don't eat too many sweets because it messes up your teeth and you will end up getting diabetes) rather than them find out after the event and have only a rear view mirror to look at
Maybe this will explain better the value in providing information both good and bad on not just this forum but in any walk of life
OK Guys point taken -
Posted by steve on 31st of Mar 2011 at 10:48 am
OK Guys point taken - let's get back to trading. Further, my advice is to simply utilize what works for you.