Posted by twedlediva on 9th of Aug 2011 at 02:59 pm
My take: Sure seems like the hit to short term bonds is a signal
to seek out bargains in the stock market...albeit
selectively...this is when new industries could take hold in the
US...nat gas comes to mind as a no brainer...if those nit wits in
DC would get real...
Posted by twedlediva on 8th of Aug 2011 at 11:46 am
I think its very possible that money will flood into the miners
now...gld:gdx ration in toilet...and perhaps it it "their time"
now....GDX was at 53+ Friday, now at 57+..hmmm...
Posted by twedlediva on 29th of Apr 2011 at 05:36 pm
Remember, u are only in 48% of the time. The system caught the
08 down move beautifully and that was a watershed event. Besides,
when the markets change, u decide whether to take the trade.
And, it's bests to keep to Matt's suggested 5-10% allocation.
Just thoughts...
Posted by twedlediva on 29th of Apr 2011 at 05:28 pm
Yojimbo,
I only see 3.36% as the largest losing trade. At 91% of
profitable trades and 35% ARR, that beats anything I have seen in
30 years. And yes, if there was a draw down of 10% or more, I would
stick with the system. I plan on taking a chunk of my retirement $
and just stay with the plan. The back testing proves, no matter
what, u will come out ahead, and I need that for a certain part of
my portfolio in these crazy times. Good luck.
Posted by twedlediva on 29th of Apr 2011 at 04:29 pm
I've read all of Matt's System pages several times. I have
compared the systems and have concluded the single is the way to go
for me as well. I'm committing funds and 100% compounding
till i'm dead!! It's like a warm blanket and certainly gives peace
of mind, ad day trading is just not my thing...thanks for your
thoughts...
Posted by twedlediva on 29th of Apr 2011 at 03:58 pm
Thanks ascr. I understand reduced losses for multi vs single,
but the return far out weights the losses over a long period of
time. Just curious what system everyone is going with...
Hopefully you all understand some Matt's comments under the SPY
tab. if you can answer, it would be much appreciated.
1. Under Multi-Entry tab, Statistics, 1st paragraph, Matt says
"the images below show trade stats for the Single Entry System.:
Does he mean actually mean 'Multi" as it says at the top of the
color charts? What time frame is the $100K/Multi that yields a net
profit of $337? In the pink box in the chart..."where as TS treats
them individually". What is "TS"?
2. If u decide on the multi system and want to allocate, say
$100K, then if the system triggers a first entry, u put in 40%. If
it triggers a second entry due to the market going down, then 20%.
If the market continues up, you are in 60% of your $100K, never
fully invested with your allocation, right?
3. Single entry: $100k = 17.6 mil net profit compounded over 16
years, multi-entry: $100K = 2.8 million net profit compounded over
16 years (i'm assuming 16 years, but it doesn't actually say this
on the Stat Compounding page.) Sooooo...aside from a bit of a
bigger draw down, the profit potential assuming the single entry
commitment is 6X greater over a 16 year period. Correct, or did I
miss something? Seems to me that only being in 50% of the time, the
system to go with is single entry. Pls argue otherwise.
3. Perhaps we could have a calculator on the site that would
show us what our allocation would turn into over time, compounded
and not compounded.
Posted by twedlediva on 21st of Dec 2010 at 05:53 pm
IMO, CXZ is a keeper guys. I think sometimes it pays to know
what you own. The 1 for 4 reverse split was unfortunate for
shareholders who held during the crash, but I believe in 3 years or
so they will be made whole. I know its sucks but that was the only
way the company could survive. This will allow better access to
financing and preferential terms, important for juniors who plan to
take their assets to production. For anyone interested, here is
some background. Since the split, there are about 46.6 shares out
for a mc of $81 million as of today. Fully diluted, the shares out
are around 60 million according to the company, so around 105
million. (Many uranium junior mc's are over double that now
btw.)
1. Funds from the $10 million financing will be used for drill
programs on their 2 Wyoming properties, Bootheel and Juniper Ridge,
and on properties in Newfoundland and Labrador. Bootheel (to be an
ISR mine/low cost) is in the permitting process, which can take up
to 3 years. The company is working on updating their resources by
this time next year.
2. Near term, (with in the next 3 months), the moratorium on
uranium exploration is expected to be lifted, although not
guaranteed. It was originally imposed for 3 years, so in my view,
it's time. Think of the jobs it could bring that area...
3. CXZ is also proving up a vanadium resource along with their
uranium assets in Labrador. If anyone is following the whole redox
battery/energy storage/clean tech area, you know this element is
critical for grid scaled energy storage by the green industry. The
Vanadiun resource update is expected in January.
4. And then there's the gold projects. more info at
www.crosshairexploration.com
I follow this one pretty closely so will post any new info that
might help. Good luck to all who are long this winner.
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
The community is delayed by three days for non registered users.
brophy
Twas the last traing day before Christmas
Posted by twedlediva on 26th of Dec 2011 at 08:19 pm
excellent!
Fed funneled 16 Trillion to Banks
Posted by twedlediva on 26th of Aug 2011 at 01:13 pm
Fed semi-audit compete...here are finding
WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?????
http:www.youtube.com/user/zedgehero
MCP
Posted by twedlediva on 17th of Aug 2011 at 11:38 am
Lets see if it can reverse now
FED Statement
Posted by twedlediva on 9th of Aug 2011 at 02:59 pm
My take: Sure seems like the hit to short term bonds is a signal to seek out bargains in the stock market...albeit selectively...this is when new industries could take hold in the US...nat gas comes to mind as a no brainer...if those nit wits in DC would get real...
Enuff of this..I'm buying...
Posted by twedlediva on 8th of Aug 2011 at 03:19 pm
bought MCP at 45.35 and LNG at 6.36...geez...
Gold miners GDX
Posted by twedlediva on 8th of Aug 2011 at 11:46 am
I think its very possible that money will flood into the miners now...gld:gdx ration in toilet...and perhaps it it "their time" now....GDX was at 53+ Friday, now at 57+..hmmm...
Best of luck Matt
Baby coming - Important!
Posted by twedlediva on 8th of May 2011 at 04:12 pm
Wishing you and your new family the best of luck...lots of joy coming your way!
Matt - no worries
SPY system did NOT go long!
Posted by twedlediva on 4th of May 2011 at 05:37 pm
Never a dull moment, eh Matt? It happens! Scottrade printed 134.83 and I was wondering if they were wrong and TS was correct.
Remember, u are only in
don't count chickens...
Posted by twedlediva on 29th of Apr 2011 at 05:36 pm
Remember, u are only in 48% of the time. The system caught the 08 down move beautifully and that was a watershed event. Besides, when the markets change, u decide whether to take the trade. And, it's bests to keep to Matt's suggested 5-10% allocation. Just thoughts...
Yojimbo, I only see 3.36% as
SPY System
Posted by twedlediva on 29th of Apr 2011 at 05:28 pm
Yojimbo,
I only see 3.36% as the largest losing trade. At 91% of profitable trades and 35% ARR, that beats anything I have seen in 30 years. And yes, if there was a draw down of 10% or more, I would stick with the system. I plan on taking a chunk of my retirement $ and just stay with the plan. The back testing proves, no matter what, u will come out ahead, and I need that for a certain part of my portfolio in these crazy times. Good luck.
single entry
SPY System
Posted by twedlediva on 29th of Apr 2011 at 04:29 pm
I've read all of Matt's System pages several times. I have compared the systems and have concluded the single is the way to go for me as well. I'm committing funds and 100% compounding till i'm dead!! It's like a warm blanket and certainly gives peace of mind, ad day trading is just not my thing...thanks for your thoughts...
Single vs multi
SPY System
Posted by twedlediva on 29th of Apr 2011 at 03:58 pm
Thanks ascr. I understand reduced losses for multi vs single, but the return far out weights the losses over a long period of time. Just curious what system everyone is going with...
SPY System
Posted by twedlediva on 29th of Apr 2011 at 03:18 pm
Hopefully you all understand some Matt's comments under the SPY tab. if you can answer, it would be much appreciated.
1. Under Multi-Entry tab, Statistics, 1st paragraph, Matt says "the images below show trade stats for the Single Entry System.: Does he mean actually mean 'Multi" as it says at the top of the color charts? What time frame is the $100K/Multi that yields a net profit of $337? In the pink box in the chart..."where as TS treats them individually". What is "TS"?
2. If u decide on the multi system and want to allocate, say $100K, then if the system triggers a first entry, u put in 40%. If it triggers a second entry due to the market going down, then 20%. If the market continues up, you are in 60% of your $100K, never fully invested with your allocation, right?
3. Single entry: $100k = 17.6 mil net profit compounded over 16 years, multi-entry: $100K = 2.8 million net profit compounded over 16 years (i'm assuming 16 years, but it doesn't actually say this on the Stat Compounding page.) Sooooo...aside from a bit of a bigger draw down, the profit potential assuming the single entry commitment is 6X greater over a 16 year period. Correct, or did I miss something? Seems to me that only being in 50% of the time, the system to go with is single entry. Pls argue otherwise.
3. Perhaps we could have a calculator on the site that would show us what our allocation would turn into over time, compounded and not compounded.
Thanks to all who take the time to respond!!
Sa.v - Southern Arc
Posted by twedlediva on 10th of Jan 2011 at 11:31 am
sa.v
Posted by twedlediva on 7th of Jan 2011 at 11:51 am
Moving up on anticipation of IUP (mining permit) to be issued
CXZ
CXZ
Posted by twedlediva on 21st of Dec 2010 at 05:53 pm
IMO, CXZ is a keeper guys. I think sometimes it pays to know what you own. The 1 for 4 reverse split was unfortunate for shareholders who held during the crash, but I believe in 3 years or so they will be made whole. I know its sucks but that was the only way the company could survive. This will allow better access to financing and preferential terms, important for juniors who plan to take their assets to production. For anyone interested, here is some background. Since the split, there are about 46.6 shares out for a mc of $81 million as of today. Fully diluted, the shares out are around 60 million according to the company, so around 105 million. (Many uranium junior mc's are over double that now btw.)
1. Funds from the $10 million financing will be used for drill programs on their 2 Wyoming properties, Bootheel and Juniper Ridge, and on properties in Newfoundland and Labrador. Bootheel (to be an ISR mine/low cost) is in the permitting process, which can take up to 3 years. The company is working on updating their resources by this time next year.
2. Near term, (with in the next 3 months), the moratorium on uranium exploration is expected to be lifted, although not guaranteed. It was originally imposed for 3 years, so in my view, it's time. Think of the jobs it could bring that area...
3. CXZ is also proving up a vanadium resource along with their uranium assets in Labrador. If anyone is following the whole redox battery/energy storage/clean tech area, you know this element is critical for grid scaled energy storage by the green industry. The Vanadiun resource update is expected in January.
4. And then there's the gold projects. more info at www.crosshairexploration.com
I follow this one pretty closely so will post any new info that might help. Good luck to all who are long this winner.