Posted by sander51 on 24th of May 2023 at 11:05 am
Steve and Matt have noted a gap in GDX around 31.11 which was
formed in early February. However thatgap was filled in early
April when GDX was rallying to the 36 area. So just curious why
that gap is still being mentioned as I thought once gaps were
filled they were no longer that important
I highly commend Matt and Steve for their exceptional work on
the systems, especially considering the substantial profits they
generated last year for those who followed their instructions.
Although no system can guarantee complete accuracy, the latest
short call may still prove to be successful. Earlier this morning I
saw a post by a member who expressed frustration about the short
call using inappropriate language, which I find unacceptable. I am
glad that post was deleted. Matt and Steve have said that the
market could reach 4300, making the ES system just one aspect of
their overall guidance. If a member lacks the ability to accept
responsibility for their choices and resorts to using foul
language, this service may not be suitable for them.
I highly commend Matt and Steve for their exceptional work on
the systems, especially considering the substantial profits they
generated last year for those who followed their instructions.
Although no system can guarantee complete accuracy, the latest
short call may still prove to be successful. Earlier this morning I
saw a post by a member who expressed frustration about the short
call using inappropriate language, which I find unacceptable. I am
glad that post was deleted. Matt and Steve have said that the
market could reach 4300, making the ES system just one aspect of
their overall guidance. If a member lacks the ability to accept
responsibility for their choices and resorts to using foul
language, this service may not be suitable for them.
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
The community is delayed by three days for non registered users.
Steve and Matt have noted
Posted by sander51 on 24th of May 2023 at 11:05 am
Steve and Matt have noted a gap in GDX around 31.11 which was formed in early February. However thatgap was filled in early April when GDX was rallying to the 36 area. So just curious why that gap is still being mentioned as I thought once gaps were filled they were no longer that important
I highly commend Matt and
Posted by sander51 on 2nd of Feb 2023 at 10:05 am
I highly commend Matt and Steve for their exceptional work on the systems, especially considering the substantial profits they generated last year for those who followed their instructions. Although no system can guarantee complete accuracy, the latest short call may still prove to be successful. Earlier this morning I saw a post by a member who expressed frustration about the short call using inappropriate language, which I find unacceptable. I am glad that post was deleted. Matt and Steve have said that the market could reach 4300, making the ES system just one aspect of their overall guidance. If a member lacks the ability to accept responsibility for their choices and resorts to using foul language, this service may not be suitable for them.
I highly commend Matt and
Posted by sander51 on 2nd of Feb 2023 at 10:05 am
I highly commend Matt and Steve for their exceptional work on the systems, especially considering the substantial profits they generated last year for those who followed their instructions. Although no system can guarantee complete accuracy, the latest short call may still prove to be successful. Earlier this morning I saw a post by a member who expressed frustration about the short call using inappropriate language, which I find unacceptable. I am glad that post was deleted. Matt and Steve have said that the market could reach 4300, making the ES system just one aspect of their overall guidance. If a member lacks the ability to accept responsibility for their choices and resorts to using foul language, this service may not be suitable for them.