"But
then there are people out there that are trying to make careers out
of issuing bold and crazy sounding predictions about the stock
market and economy. Some of them have just gotten big in the past
year and to me sound like astrologers. I've had enough of
it."
This guy's track record is not quite as he paints it in his free
posts. I used to subscribe to his service while I was a bit
of a gold bug. In late fall of 2005, right before gold made a
huge run, he sold out of all his gold stocks in anticipation of a
10% down move. Oooops, it was a 50% up move that he avoided.
In 2006 he issued a "bold and crazy prediction" about how we
are entering a massive bear market.... the market continued up!
He claims to have caught the top of the market and shorted
for massive profits.... in fact, his main thesis at the market top
was how gold was going to the moon and how he was heavily invested
in gold stocks -- RIGHT AT THE TOP!!! What is funny is how
when he takes on these massive positions at the wrong time (in
volatile sectors), he seldom brings it up again, but will say in
hindsight that he was stopped out for breakeven. Yeah
right.
He didn't catch any of this bull market run so far.... none of
it!!!!! He was sitting in cash. Maybe he bought up full
positions last Monday? That is what he was hinting at in his
article.
I know that nobody is perfect, I just find it hypocritical of
Swanson that he is telling us to be cautious of people who try to
lure you in with bold headline predictions... he is the most guilty
culprit!
Posted by padraigm on 24th of Aug 2009 at 10:28 am
I have been a subscriber for the last 11 months and I am very
skeptical of how he approaches the market. He would not consider a
buy in March and shorted the market 3 or 4 times in the Spring only
to be stopped out. Now we have the never ending bull - gimme a
break! I will let my subscription lapse in September and renew here
at BPT
Were you aware that Mike was shorting this market during the
March to June time frame? He was stopped out about 5 times
and just recently pronounced that the SPX was in a Secular Bull
market after it had already gone up 50%. We have been net
LONG since March with dozens of long side picks (see the watch
list). However, we will NOT become complacent with indexes
approaching some key resistance areas.
Our view is to trade the trend and identify support and
resistance along the way (actually use technical analysis) while
Mike just shoots from the hip.
Posted by window72 on 24th of Aug 2009 at 11:30 am
I've subscibed to Mike and I like him, the way he comes across.
He tries his best, he's not a pump and dumper or anything like
that. He's got a good 'stages' methodology from Sam Weinstein's
book that I've been using, although it never pretends to be able to
get you in at the bottom.
That's the one thing I'll take forward from him because I've
noticed less consistency in his application of this and in
general. He does some good longer term think pieces also, if you
like that sort of thing. Actually, that's what he's best at and
what he says does help in cautioning against trying to pick a
top.
As far as short term market calls go though, we're far better
off over here. Even though I don't get the wave stuff, the
indicator work is (gradually) making me react a bit quicker to
things. LOL, grrr.
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
Is Mike Swanson right???
Posted by flmaia on 24th of Aug 2009 at 10:12 am
Check it out if you want?
http://www.wallstreetwindow.com/content/node/11442
It is opposite of BP's view
Hi Steve, Nothing personal, it is
Posted by flmaia on 24th of Aug 2009 at 10:38 am
Hi Steve,
Nothing personal, it is just part of the market's conflicting viewpoints.
I am not his paid client.
Thanks for sharing these informations.
Some history on Swanson....
Posted by kalinm on 24th of Aug 2009 at 10:31 am
"But then there are people out there that are trying to make careers out of issuing bold and crazy sounding predictions about the stock market and economy. Some of them have just gotten big in the past year and to me sound like astrologers. I've had enough of it."
This guy's track record is not quite as he paints it in his free posts. I used to subscribe to his service while I was a bit of a gold bug. In late fall of 2005, right before gold made a huge run, he sold out of all his gold stocks in anticipation of a 10% down move. Oooops, it was a 50% up move that he avoided. In 2006 he issued a "bold and crazy prediction" about how we are entering a massive bear market.... the market continued up! He claims to have caught the top of the market and shorted for massive profits.... in fact, his main thesis at the market top was how gold was going to the moon and how he was heavily invested in gold stocks -- RIGHT AT THE TOP!!! What is funny is how when he takes on these massive positions at the wrong time (in volatile sectors), he seldom brings it up again, but will say in hindsight that he was stopped out for breakeven. Yeah right.
He didn't catch any of this bull market run so far.... none of it!!!!! He was sitting in cash. Maybe he bought up full positions last Monday? That is what he was hinting at in his article.
I know that nobody is perfect, I just find it hypocritical of Swanson that he is telling us to be cautious of people who try to lure you in with bold headline predictions... he is the most guilty culprit!
I have been a subscriber
Posted by padraigm on 24th of Aug 2009 at 10:28 am
I have been a subscriber for the last 11 months and I am very skeptical of how he approaches the market. He would not consider a buy in March and shorted the market 3 or 4 times in the Spring only to be stopped out. Now we have the never ending bull - gimme a break! I will let my subscription lapse in September and renew here at BPT
Pat
Were you aware that Mike
Posted by steve on 24th of Aug 2009 at 10:26 am
Were you aware that Mike was shorting this market during the March to June time frame? He was stopped out about 5 times and just recently pronounced that the SPX was in a Secular Bull market after it had already gone up 50%. We have been net LONG since March with dozens of long side picks (see the watch list). However, we will NOT become complacent with indexes approaching some key resistance areas.
Was he right when he
Posted by steve on 24th of Aug 2009 at 10:18 am
Was he right when he went long Gold stocks just before they plunged over 50%?
Hell if you listened to Mike over the past two years you would be broke.
Our view is to trade
Posted by steve on 24th of Aug 2009 at 10:17 am
Our view is to trade the trend and identify support and resistance along the way (actually use technical analysis) while Mike just shoots from the hip.
The Swan
Posted by window72 on 24th of Aug 2009 at 11:30 am
I've subscibed to Mike and I like him, the way he comes across. He tries his best, he's not a pump and dumper or anything like that. He's got a good 'stages' methodology from Sam Weinstein's book that I've been using, although it never pretends to be able to get you in at the bottom.
That's the one thing I'll take forward from him because I've noticed less consistency in his application of this and in general. He does some good longer term think pieces also, if you like that sort of thing. Actually, that's what he's best at and what he says does help in cautioning against trying to pick a top.
As far as short term market calls go though, we're far better off over here. Even though I don't get the wave stuff, the indicator work is (gradually) making me react a bit quicker to things. LOL, grrr.