- NO losing years.
- avg # trades per year 6 -7
- avg Max DD is -5%, Max historical DD is -8.3% - and this is
a leveraged ETF (buy/hold avg DD is 28.6% with a max of -61%
- avg annual gain is 42.6% vs 24.7% for buy/hold
- days in winning trades 54, days in losing trades 8 to 9, so
it gets out off losers quickly
why not keep both? seems like they both get the job done,
the returns are similar. If you did a 50/50% blend of each I
bet you improve the returns because there are a few years the sso
78 did better, and other years it did not do much worse.
are you able to run a backrest using 50% in SSO 60 &
50% in SSO 78?
New SSO 2X SPY HP KISS
Posted by matt on 1st of May 2025 at 02:57 pm
the stats are so insane on this, gonna replace the 78 min version.
https://breakpointtrades.com/sts_premium/sts_stats/?symbol=SSO&time=60&system=1
- NO losing years.
- avg # trades per year 6 -7
- avg Max DD is -5%, Max historical DD is -8.3% - and this is a leveraged ETF (buy/hold avg DD is 28.6% with a max of -61%
- avg annual gain is 42.6% vs 24.7% for buy/hold
- days in winning trades 54, days in losing trades 8 to 9, so it gets out off losers quickly
why not keep both? seems
Posted by jonesy85 on 2nd of May 2025 at 12:37 pm
why not keep both? seems like they both get the job done, the returns are similar. If you did a 50/50% blend of each I bet you improve the returns because there are a few years the sso 78 did better, and other years it did not do much worse.
are you able to run a backrest using 50% in SSO 60 & 50% in SSO 78?
hell yeah
Posted by jmgsm1013 on 1st of May 2025 at 04:19 pm
hell yeah
Is QLD 60 better than
Posted by jonesy85 on 2nd of May 2025 at 02:11 pm
Is QLD 60 better than QLD 78? #LFG!