also from an educational standpoint on
demand: notice the bounce off demand zone back in late June.
Ultimately price formed a lower high and sold off and lost that
demand zone BUT you still got a nice bounce off demand, as I told
you, first test of demand is almost always bought - that could be a
strategy itself. Now price is testing bottom demand
anyway back in May to illustrate
how low risk of a buy that pullback was:
1. You had an ABC 3-wave pullback
2. that pullback was into the 61.8%
Fib
you had two important technical events
lining up at the same spot - again very low risk when you have
multiple things, NOT just one thing like a stock pattern or
trendline - a very good textbook pattern many times is good enough
for an objective low risk trade, but when you have other technical
factors confirming or lining up, makes it higher
probability
A VERY high probability trading system
would be buying abc pullbacks into the 61.8% Fib or 50 day or 200
day MA - however your only problem might be finding enough setups
to trade - if one could write a scan for those conditions maybe
more of those show up than we know of, if that's the only setups
you took, you would kick butt with very tight stops risk as
well
see if Friday's lows hold. Otherwise chart was broken with that
offering. Friday bounced off a demand zone, if one still had
shares could place a stop there
that said, guys always have your exit plan before you even buy a
stock, I'm sure vast majority were stopped out, which is just part
of trading. But if one still has shares you now need to place
your stop and exit plan and realize that also depends on what your
plan is. A pure trader would have been out, or may still hold onto
some but decide to exit if a bounce occurs soon. I say this
because the chart is broken for a while, it will need time to
recover, so another trader who might be willing to give it the time
it needs to base out and recover and is willing to stay in it for a
while might use a wide stop.
again the hope here is this ABC into demand if price can form a
higher low, however the March/April lows are also pretty close and
while price has bounced off demand (remember first test of demand
is generally bought) it might ultimately fail and retest those
April lows or undercut them - at this time you just don't know, we
have to let if flesh out.
for me I took my lumps on Friday, it bounced off demand and I
managed to sell the bounce off Friday's lows, took my lumps and
moved on. For others still in, my comments above
apply
remember the baseball analogy, it's about your batting average
and having a plan with defined risk. Just like a baseball
player you have a lot of strike outs, some walks etc, it's not
about each at bat, it's about your long term average - these things
happen, it's part of trading. Just like striking out is a
part of baseball, you don't freak out about a strike out if overall
you are a good hitter, strikeouts are a part of the game, just like
stopping out or getting a bad trade is part of the trading game
regarding Elliot Wave, what I've highlighted is a very
simplistic by powerful an useful way to use it. With Elliot Wave
it's easy to go down the rabbit hole and try to label all these
crazy counts and micro counts etc and that gets overly complex and
actually hinders trading.
my method is to keep it very simple:
1. In up trending environments look for 3-wave abc pullbacks as
buying opportunities- same for shorts on downtrends, short
abc bounces. coils can form instead and if they do they are 5
waves but overlapping) but most of the time you see abcs
2. most folks know what the traditional 5 wave impulse looks
like. Wave 4's can't overlap top of wave 1 in an uptrend or
bottom of wave 1 in a downtrend, It's pretty obvious just looking
at a chart when you are in an impulse.
coils have 5 waves. and 5 waves up or down that are
overlapping are corrective not impulsive
also - true 5 waves always have MACD divergence, if no
divergence most likely it's a wave 3 instead
so when looking at a stock that has had a correction, if
all you see is a bunch of up and down waves overlapping each other,
even if price has been stair stepping lower, that's clearly NOT an
impulsive trending move down, it's ultimately corrective and
bullish, not starting a major downtrend - so you know that it will
eventually resolve up
simply viewing EW like this in a very simplistic way is good
enough for most people to use it very effectively vs having to
study all the dozens of wave counts and rules that can take months
and years to really get good at - with this simplistic approach you
can use it right away with your trading
regarding some of these slow moving ETF's
like DBA an PDBC - I have received messages like, Matt why would I
waste money on things that move such small percentages, ties up too
much money, I need stuff that moves.
I tell these people, not everything needs to be or should be
high flying beta stocks/ETFs, Quantum stocks etc, that move 10% and
20% a day - yes nice to catch trends on those for sure. However a
big part of trading is mental, and stuff like that that is highly
volatile, has huge average true ranges, I cannot personally stomach
buying big positions, because I can't handle the noise, like a
pullback that is just noise can be a lot of money - easy to
stop out on loss. Whereas PDBC, DBA yes they move slowly like 1% to
0.5% in a day, but it also means I can hold a much larger
percentage and not worry about it, let it work, not get emotional
on noise fluctuations.
Also good example, guys told me about
that on PDBC. Well...buying it in late Dec or early Jan when I said
the was the objective buy signal on that channel break - by mid
April it was up 40%!!! Those small incremental moves added up
a lot over 4 months - so yeah small daily moves, but up 40%
in 4.5 months - that doesn't seem small at all, that's 2 good years
of SPX growth. Like compound interest those incremental small daily
moves add up over time
what I like about them is, that it is not
a common technique used by most technicians. most are using RSI for
overbought or oversold or divergences, and only draw trendlines on
the price candles
however these RSI trendline breaks can
give VERY objective signals
updated views - prices got pretty close
to the 61.8% Fib on both, this morning price bounced perversely off
demand, and then at the highs earlier pulled right back off supply
- see how easy those supply/demand zones work.
also I can draw uptrend lines on the RSI
14 to use as a possible sell signal in the future as well
in strong uptrends, you BUY 3-wave
pullbacks. Also notice after that first big ABC on the 60 min
and subsequent bounce, you had a small abc pullback again!
again I bought it because it was very
close to big support, which enabled me to place a very tight
stop.
that's what trading is about; identifying
'breakpoints' important support/resistance areas where you can take
a trade with a tight stop and higher reward potential. It's not
about having a crystal ball and knowing what's going to happen and
being right all the time; it's about identifying those low risk
entries
HUM - Humana, Inc. - Chart LinkHUM keeps
humming along. I suggest moving stop up to where I show the
new dotted line. Note target is that open gap
also from an educational standpoint note
the swing stops. So when one first bought this, your initial
stop would have been placed at the low of that pattern. Then your
swing stop would have been moved to the next higher low, and
finally today I'd move it up a 3rd time
I'm showing this as an educational
because this is a behavior I see sometimes on bullish symmetry
breaks. One thing I've noticed is that if you get a slight symmetry
break like you have here i.e. 5.7 point bounce vs the previous
largest 5.2 bounce, that's only a slightly break, many times
instead of a good higher low, you get almost a double bottom retest
like you see here. Technically forms a very slight higher low.
When you get a much stronger bullish
symmetry break; for example let's set the bounce off the lows was 8
points instead of simply 5.7, then more than likely you would NOT
get a double bottom, but a much higher higher low.
anyway I'm adding this to the educational channel for
future reference.
otherwise XHB continues to look good,
nice bottom there, looks higher over time still
Compare - SPX vs HYG 60 min - Chart Linkthe HYG
gave a bullish divergence at the lows as it leads and it kept
leading to the upside, which caused the SPX to play catch up
now short term there's a slight negative
divergence with the slight lower high on HYG vs higher high on
SPX
no changes....RSI oversold, RSI 40 longs holding, and hi mid lo
show holding on MES
QE 3.2 and RSI oversold longs holding on SPY
longs doing fantastic! clearly hi mid lo short on ES
taking a hit, but MORE than offset from the open longs - systems
are far more long than they are short. SPY has not shorts either.
you also see why I still issue trades for all the 22 systems
because once in a while you get one that takes some draw down or
early entry or whatever, but other systems offset that and
counteract it.
While I like the idea of placing all the systems on one chart so
that only one system can ever trigger (it's first come first serve)
while that's far simpler to follow because you only ever have 1
system that can be active and only 3 entries total (makes the math
easy) by odds once in a while you'll get the 'bugger' system that
enters too early or exits too early or whatever, and you then miss
the risk management and diversification the other systems will
offer.
The point of having 22 different mean reversion systems is
that they are all doing different things, and it's part of the risk
management because of the diversification. We've seen that
occur in real time with the systems lately when the RSI 40 went
long way too early on MES futures (but the other systems went long
later and at better prices to offset that). Now of course the RSI
40 is very profitable, even the first EARLY entry LOL. And
currently we have this 3rd entry short on MES futures taking heat,
however we have two open long systems on MES futures that more than
offset that. And of course two open longs on SPY
LOL yes and no - sometimes systems make people more
emotional.
and in particular mean reversion systems because of their nature
of buying into market selloffs that feel completely unnatural and
scary to folks who's brain is telling them to do the
opposite.
the KISS systems, while they can take similar draw downs or even
higher ones at times, people seem to get less emotional
because of their nature, they are not buying into a downtrend and
they have initial stops, so people tend not to get that emotional
with them, even if they take a 5% or 10% drawdown, whereas when
mean reversion systems take a similar drawdown people get very
emotional and worried as shit
Some of you may have also noticed some changes on the trading
community with new buttons for Educational, Favorites, KISS,
Matt's Macro V, I'll be designating posts to those areas over
time.
I'm also going to add this to the educational section
anyway as I stated on Friday, in my observations over the years,
OPEX Options Expiration on Friday's tends to be quite choppy most
of the time. That said, on days when the market has a trend move
(one direction) on Friday OPEX like it did on Friday with the
market selling off all day in one trend. Almost always when
that happens you will get a decent bounce the last 5 or 10 min of
the day that also lasts into the after hrs as all those options
expire and contracts settle. We saw this on Friday
obviously
remember the cycle indicator is quite unique for a variety of
reasons.
1. Most indicators you guys use (included me) are all price
based and derivatives of the same thing. MA's, MACD, RSI,
Stochastic, all basically derivatives of the same thing
2. The cycle indicator works on a totally different method.
It was also first designed for the audio industry back in the
1970's to measures signal to noise ratio.
3. It sort of works like an Elliot Wave indicator. It
identifies chop abc abc abc's very well, and trending
conditions
1. had 5 clear waves, true wedge patterns
have 5 waves
2. had MACD divergence, true 5 wave wedge
patterns have MACD divergence, if no MACD divergence then most
likely you are still in a wave 3 NOT a 5
3. breakaway gap out of the wedge -
breakaway gaps are very bullish
that said a wedge like this I would
always buy in the wedge vs waiting for a break because many times
you will get a breakaway gap out of the pattern vs a clean break of
the trendline where you might want to buy but can't
Newsletter
Subscribe to our email list for regular free market updates
as well as a chance to get coupons!
RKLB demand and educational
Posted by matt on 28th of Jul 2026 at 10:49 am
RKLB - Rocket Lab USA space, Inc. - Chart LinkRKLB typical of many space related stocks lately, huge Christmas Tree pattern.
also from an educational standpoint on demand: notice the bounce off demand zone back in late June. Ultimately price formed a lower high and sold off and lost that demand zone BUT you still got a nice bounce off demand, as I told you, first test of demand is almost always bought - that could be a strategy itself. Now price is testing bottom demand
BAC beat nicely today also educational post on that ABC pullback
Posted by matt on 14th of Jul 2026 at 10:08 am
BAC - Bank Of America Corp. - Chart Linkbeat earnings, big move. Banks are loving funding all the AI BS LOL
anyway back in May to illustrate how low risk of a buy that pullback was:
1. You had an ABC 3-wave pullback
2. that pullback was into the 61.8% Fib
you had two important technical events lining up at the same spot - again very low risk when you have multiple things, NOT just one thing like a stock pattern or trendline - a very good textbook pattern many times is good enough for an objective low risk trade, but when you have other technical factors confirming or lining up, makes it higher probability
A VERY high probability trading system would be buying abc pullbacks into the 61.8% Fib or 50 day or 200 day MA - however your only problem might be finding enough setups to trade - if one could write a scan for those conditions maybe more of those show up than we know of, if that's the only setups you took, you would kick butt with very tight stops risk as well
see if Friday's lows hold.
Does anyone have any thoughts on FRMI ? Thanks
Posted by matt on 13th of Jul 2026 at 10:54 am
see if Friday's lows hold. Otherwise chart was broken with that offering. Friday bounced off a demand zone, if one still had shares could place a stop there
that said, guys always have your exit plan before you even buy a stock, I'm sure vast majority were stopped out, which is just part of trading. But if one still has shares you now need to place your stop and exit plan and realize that also depends on what your plan is. A pure trader would have been out, or may still hold onto some but decide to exit if a bounce occurs soon. I say this because the chart is broken for a while, it will need time to recover, so another trader who might be willing to give it the time it needs to base out and recover and is willing to stay in it for a while might use a wide stop.
again the hope here is this ABC into demand if price can form a higher low, however the March/April lows are also pretty close and while price has bounced off demand (remember first test of demand is generally bought) it might ultimately fail and retest those April lows or undercut them - at this time you just don't know, we have to let if flesh out.
for me I took my lumps on Friday, it bounced off demand and I managed to sell the bounce off Friday's lows, took my lumps and moved on. For others still in, my comments above apply
remember the baseball analogy, it's about your batting average and having a plan with defined risk. Just like a baseball player you have a lot of strike outs, some walks etc, it's not about each at bat, it's about your long term average - these things happen, it's part of trading. Just like striking out is a part of baseball, you don't freak out about a strike out if overall you are a good hitter, strikeouts are a part of the game, just like stopping out or getting a bad trade is part of the trading game
regarding Elliot Wave, what I've
NICE move on META on that news
Posted by matt on 10th of Jul 2026 at 09:52 am
regarding Elliot Wave, what I've highlighted is a very simplistic by powerful an useful way to use it. With Elliot Wave it's easy to go down the rabbit hole and try to label all these crazy counts and micro counts etc and that gets overly complex and actually hinders trading.
my method is to keep it very simple:
1. In up trending environments look for 3-wave abc pullbacks as buying opportunities- same for shorts on downtrends, short abc bounces. coils can form instead and if they do they are 5 waves but overlapping) but most of the time you see abcs
2. most folks know what the traditional 5 wave impulse looks like. Wave 4's can't overlap top of wave 1 in an uptrend or bottom of wave 1 in a downtrend, It's pretty obvious just looking at a chart when you are in an impulse.
coils have 5 waves. and 5 waves up or down that are overlapping are corrective not impulsive
also - true 5 waves always have MACD divergence, if no divergence most likely it's a wave 3 instead
so when looking at a stock that has had a correction, if all you see is a bunch of up and down waves overlapping each other, even if price has been stair stepping lower, that's clearly NOT an impulsive trending move down, it's ultimately corrective and bullish, not starting a major downtrend - so you know that it will eventually resolve up
simply viewing EW like this in a very simplistic way is good enough for most people to use it very effectively vs having to study all the dozens of wave counts and rules that can take months and years to really get good at - with this simplistic approach you can use it right away with your trading
PDBC and DBA/PDBA small % movers and trading discussion/educational
Posted by matt on 16th of Jun 2026 at 12:52 pm
regarding some of these slow moving ETF's like DBA an PDBC - I have received messages like, Matt why would I waste money on things that move such small percentages, ties up too much money, I need stuff that moves.
I tell these people, not everything needs to be or should be high flying beta stocks/ETFs, Quantum stocks etc, that move 10% and 20% a day - yes nice to catch trends on those for sure. However a big part of trading is mental, and stuff like that that is highly volatile, has huge average true ranges, I cannot personally stomach buying big positions, because I can't handle the noise, like a pullback that is just noise can be a lot of money - easy to stop out on loss. Whereas PDBC, DBA yes they move slowly like 1% to 0.5% in a day, but it also means I can hold a much larger percentage and not worry about it, let it work, not get emotional on noise fluctuations.
Also good example, guys told me about that on PDBC. Well...buying it in late Dec or early Jan when I said the was the objective buy signal on that channel break - by mid April it was up 40%!!! Those small incremental moves added up a lot over 4 months - so yeah small daily moves, but up 40% in 4.5 months - that doesn't seem small at all, that's 2 good years of SPX growth. Like compound interest those incremental small daily moves add up over time
Commodities PDBC Weekly - Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF - Chart Linkbought in December, sold in late April looking to get back in sometime
Commodity - Agriculture DBA ST - Chart Link had bought back in a few days ago, added more yesterday
Educational examples of RSI Trendline breaks for buy/sell signals
Posted by matt on 16th of Jun 2026 at 12:38 pm
QQQ 15 View - Chart Linkamazing how well those well defined RSI trendline breaks work.
what I like about them is, that it is not a common technique used by most technicians. most are using RSI for overbought or oversold or divergences, and only draw trendlines on the price candles
however these RSI trendline breaks can give VERY objective signals
Bitcoin Coin Zoom out - Chart Link
_t INDU Dow b Weekly a - Chart Link
SPY and QQQ 15 min charts: supply/demand and educational
Posted by matt on 12th of Jun 2026 at 11:55 am
updated views - prices got pretty close to the 61.8% Fib on both, this morning price bounced perversely off demand, and then at the highs earlier pulled right back off supply - see how easy those supply/demand zones work.
also I can draw uptrend lines on the RSI 14 to use as a possible sell signal in the future as well
SPY 15 min SPX g - SPDR S&P 500 ETF - Chart Link,
QQQ 15 View - Chart Link
HUM has just been a powerhoue
Posted by matt on 11th of Jun 2026 at 11:46 am
HUM - Humana, Inc. - Chart Linkcrazy how one could have ridden that like a surfer riding a super long wave
HUM has been a masterclass in how to move swing stops up and stay in a position
Posted by matt on 1st of Jun 2026 at 09:42 am
HUM - Humana, Inc. - Chart Link
Update: DXYZ boom baby!
DXYZ boom baby!
Posted by matt on 22nd of May 2026 at 09:39 am
DXYZ 60 min SpaceX - Destiny Tech100 Inc. - Chart Linkagain from an educational standpoint, the 3-wave ABC pullback was your buying opportunity.
in strong uptrends, you BUY 3-wave pullbacks. Also notice after that first big ABC on the 60 min and subsequent bounce, you had a small abc pullback again!
DXYZ daily SpaceX - Destiny Tech100 Inc. - Chart Linkdaily
Update: TDUP
TDUP
Posted by matt on 20th of May 2026 at 12:07 pm
TDUP - ThredUp Inc. - Chart Linkremember I commented that I bought TDUP yesterday with stop at yestrday's low, nice pop today.
again I bought it because it was very close to big support, which enabled me to place a very tight stop.
that's what trading is about; identifying 'breakpoints' important support/resistance areas where you can take a trade with a tight stop and higher reward potential. It's not about having a crystal ball and knowing what's going to happen and being right all the time; it's about identifying those low risk entries
HUM, wow what a showcase of how to enter and move stops to stay in a trend
Posted by matt on 19th of May 2026 at 12:00 pm
HUM - Humana, Inc. - Chart Link
HUM still humming along, new stop and target and educational
Posted by matt on 6th of May 2026 at 10:02 am
HUM - Humana, Inc. - Chart LinkHUM keeps humming along. I suggest moving stop up to where I show the new dotted line. Note target is that open gap
also from an educational standpoint note the swing stops. So when one first bought this, your initial stop would have been placed at the low of that pattern. Then your swing stop would have been moved to the next higher low, and finally today I'd move it up a 3rd time
XHB symmetry break educational discussion
Posted by matt on 10th of Apr 2026 at 10:49 am
XHB 2hr - SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF - Chart Linkhere's an update on XHB, homebuilders ETF that I've been long, remember I pointed out that bullish symmetry break in late February
I'm showing this as an educational because this is a behavior I see sometimes on bullish symmetry breaks. One thing I've noticed is that if you get a slight symmetry break like you have here i.e. 5.7 point bounce vs the previous largest 5.2 bounce, that's only a slightly break, many times instead of a good higher low, you get almost a double bottom retest like you see here. Technically forms a very slight higher low.
When you get a much stronger bullish symmetry break; for example let's set the bounce off the lows was 8 points instead of simply 5.7, then more than likely you would NOT get a double bottom, but a much higher higher low.
anyway I'm adding this to the educational channel for future reference.
otherwise XHB continues to look good, nice bottom there, looks higher over time still
HYG vs SPX some divergence here
Posted by matt on 9th of Apr 2026 at 04:19 pm
Compare - SPX vs HYG 60 min - Chart Linkthe HYG gave a bullish divergence at the lows as it leads and it kept leading to the upside, which caused the SPX to play catch up
now short term there's a slight negative divergence with the slight lower high on HYG vs higher high on SPX
Mean Reversion systems on SPY and MES futures no changes and detailed discussion
Posted by matt on 9th of Apr 2026 at 02:36 pm
no changes....RSI oversold, RSI 40 longs holding, and hi mid lo show holding on MES
QE 3.2 and RSI oversold longs holding on SPY
longs doing fantastic! clearly hi mid lo short on ES taking a hit, but MORE than offset from the open longs - systems are far more long than they are short. SPY has not shorts either.
you also see why I still issue trades for all the 22 systems because once in a while you get one that takes some draw down or early entry or whatever, but other systems offset that and counteract it.
While I like the idea of placing all the systems on one chart so that only one system can ever trigger (it's first come first serve) while that's far simpler to follow because you only ever have 1 system that can be active and only 3 entries total (makes the math easy) by odds once in a while you'll get the 'bugger' system that enters too early or exits too early or whatever, and you then miss the risk management and diversification the other systems will offer.
The point of having 22 different mean reversion systems is that they are all doing different things, and it's part of the risk management because of the diversification. We've seen that occur in real time with the systems lately when the RSI 40 went long way too early on MES futures (but the other systems went long later and at better prices to offset that). Now of course the RSI 40 is very profitable, even the first EARLY entry LOL. And currently we have this 3rd entry short on MES futures taking heat, however we have two open long systems on MES futures that more than offset that. And of course two open longs on SPY
LOL yes and no -
SPY and MES mean reversion systems I may take off a couple contracts
Posted by matt on 8th of Apr 2026 at 10:30 am
LOL yes and no - sometimes systems make people more emotional.
and in particular mean reversion systems because of their nature of buying into market selloffs that feel completely unnatural and scary to folks who's brain is telling them to do the opposite.
the KISS systems, while they can take similar draw downs or even higher ones at times, people seem to get less emotional because of their nature, they are not buying into a downtrend and they have initial stops, so people tend not to get that emotional with them, even if they take a 5% or 10% drawdown, whereas when mean reversion systems take a similar drawdown people get very emotional and worried as shit
Educational Post: Trend Day and reversal late in day on OPEX Options Expiration Days
Posted by matt on 21st of Mar 2026 at 01:44 pm
Some of you may have also noticed some changes on the trading community with new buttons for Educational, Favorites, KISS, Matt's Macro V, I'll be designating posts to those areas over time.
I'm also going to add this to the educational section
anyway as I stated on Friday, in my observations over the years, OPEX Options Expiration on Friday's tends to be quite choppy most of the time. That said, on days when the market has a trend move (one direction) on Friday OPEX like it did on Friday with the market selling off all day in one trend. Almost always when that happens you will get a decent bounce the last 5 or 10 min of the day that also lasts into the after hrs as all those options expire and contracts settle. We saw this on Friday obviously
remember the cycle indicator is
4hr charts of ES futures and SPY - focus on the custom cycle indicator
Posted by matt on 4th of Mar 2026 at 10:24 am
remember the cycle indicator is quite unique for a variety of reasons.
1. Most indicators you guys use (included me) are all price based and derivatives of the same thing. MA's, MACD, RSI, Stochastic, all basically derivatives of the same thing
2. The cycle indicator works on a totally different method. It was also first designed for the audio industry back in the 1970's to measures signal to noise ratio.
3. It sort of works like an Elliot Wave indicator. It identifies chop abc abc abc's very well, and trending conditions
here's some examples
BOIL Wedge - Educational post
Posted by matt on 22nd of Jan 2026 at 09:59 am
BOIL 2hr nat gas - ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas - Chart Link
this wedge was perfect here's why:
1. had 5 clear waves, true wedge patterns have 5 waves
2. had MACD divergence, true 5 wave wedge patterns have MACD divergence, if no MACD divergence then most likely you are still in a wave 3 NOT a 5
3. breakaway gap out of the wedge - breakaway gaps are very bullish
that said a wedge like this I would always buy in the wedge vs waiting for a break because many times you will get a breakaway gap out of the pattern vs a clean break of the trendline where you might want to buy but can't